Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Financially? Critically?

Financially? Critically?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
4 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC


    tranm98 — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 03:04 PM)

    Financially? Critically?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      MaxRenn2 — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 03:16 PM)

      Of course the promise of money is the motivator, but on top of that was the fact that they were going to partner with Marvel Studios and get Spidey in the already-in-place MCU rather than having their separate Sony universe.

      Nancy Pelosi: "Tell 'em you're a Muslim. Tell 'em you're a Muslim."

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        deadpixel128 — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 03:35 PM)

        It was a financial disappointment (I'm not even entirely sure it made back its budget, when marketing is taken into account), as well as the poor critical reception.
        If you can't defend a movie without bashing another, you will be put on ignore. No exceptions.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Ramboman24 — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 03:36 PM)

          The only reason they discontinued Spider-man was because they saw a special opportunity to partner with Marvel and potential to make Spider-man HUGE again through Marvel.
          If that opportunity wasn't there I feel they would've just continued with TASM series. Having 3 true "Sony Spider-man" reboots in such a short amount of time would've been dumb.
          Doing the "Marvel Spider-man" reboot didn't make it seem as ridiculous.
          The Pact

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups