Leaked Image of Superman's New Black Suit
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC
tranquilvoid — 9 years ago(January 20, 2017 09:41 PM)
-
jaystarstar — 9 years ago(January 20, 2017 11:05 PM)
Oh awesome they're going to keep ripping off the stupid 1992 storyline despite BvS bombing like a turd in the punchbowl.
The moronic "Death of Superman" storyline pretty much tanked the print comics industry in the 1990s. Now they seem to want to see if it can tank the comic-book movie industry too.- You ever seen Superman $#$# his pants? Case closed.
-
RealModernMan — 9 years ago(January 21, 2017 02:41 AM)
Damn. No mullet.
I guess it makes sense though. Superman's mullet was so 90's ish and a fad which people hated hence why he cut his hair on his wedding day to Lois in 96.
How does it feel to be deconstructed? -
deadpixel128 — 9 years ago(January 21, 2017 05:47 AM)
That's an old photo that could mean absolutely anything. It's probably just a black-and-white photo of the red-and-blue suit.
If you can't defend a movie without bashing another, you will be put on ignore. No exceptions. -
yukio14 — 9 years ago(January 22, 2017 03:03 AM)
nooooo!!!! the first two movie superman suit is just gritty, grounded and dark
this one is more gritty, more grounded and more dark
not black.. but gritty, grounded and dark
yeah you'll hear WB execs and Fanatics keep repeating those three words like that will somehow justified that it's okay to make a turd movie and love it
i feed the trolls and have them tap dancing for my amusement -
OdumC — 9 years ago(January 22, 2017 07:55 AM)
Didn't he wear a black suit in his first two films as well?
I thought that as well til I saw some unfiltered behind the scenes production pics, and the suit was actually blue and red before color filtering.Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick