Makes Superman 3 and 4 look like genius.
-
TheSolarSailor — 15 years ago(June 19, 2010 07:29 PM)
Little baby fanbois like
mrhappening
can't stand being slapped in the face with reality. I'll never understand why fans turn into whiny bitches who delude themselves into thinking that their precious film is more than it really was. Why is it so important to you that you sacrificed credibility and common sense in such a way? Be a fan, but don't be a deluded idiot about it. Well, I guess that is too late, seeing that you're already there as judged by your passion for an old movie about Supergirl that makes you act so foolishly idiotic. Just know that I am laughing over your apparent obsession and your inability to maturely handle yourself on IMDb. Have fun with that, silly deluded fanboi. Just know that extremists like yourself are an embarrassment to normal fans.
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
-
HeartMonger — 15 years ago(June 19, 2010 04:02 PM)
Hey little buddy,
You don't know what you're talking about. The reviews (of which I HAVE studied thank you) were varied from state to state. It was well received in the mid-west. It was praised in the NYT, and LAT, In Chicago, and everywhere else it was hailed as "a good try" with Faye and Helen being praised, and other factors, like the effects and Goldmith's score being acclaimed.
There were a few cities (i.e. Oklahoma City, many in Iowa, etc) that did not give the film a bad review. But also remember that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. So as to whether it's a good film, there opinions, and facts. You state the opinions, I state the facts. Stop wasting your breath kiddo.
Young man is angry! Girl is afraid! He wants to get high, she wants to get paid! City's Burning! -
TheSolarSailor — 15 years ago(June 19, 2010 07:36 PM)
HeartMonger
, I'll assume that was directed at me. Your attempts to talk down from imagined pedestals exposes your own inadequate arguments from the start, I'm sorry to say. I was alive and more than old enough to follow Supergirl's performance from back in the day without having to look at it through rose-colored glasses like some here feel the need to do, but let's face it, EVERY film has the handful of folks who do this. Yes, even the terrible Catwoman. The film has fans and there is nothing wrong with that, but there is something wrong with fans who live in a bubble that is designed to prevent their precious movie from suffering any sort of critique. In another thread, you tell people they are wrong (just like you've done here) and then go on about how Supergirl is not campy, as well as reading all sorts of things into the film that simply wasn't there to start with. You are making things up in an effort to present the film as a masterpiece when it is really nothing more than a campy adventure that is purely what the Salkinds had wanted to do ever since they first started working on Superman. Yes, it's a fun flick. Yes, Faye Dunaway was lots of fun in the role of a evil witch, and Helen Slater was great as Supergirlbut the film could have been so much more. Quite frankly, the premise was weak, the material of children's programming. The stakes were bedding a good looking guy, for goodness sakes. The movie is nothing more than the sum of its parts. This was the final nail in the Salkinds' big screen presentations of the super-franchise, a huge success with the first two movies that they managed to eventually run into the ground as they staved off the talent behind the camera in favor of light and campy fluff. Why must one's enjoyment of a film suddenly make anyone elses comments who doesn't fully 100% agree with you be absolutely wrong? Your opinion is not fact, and I believe that your opinion causes you to not see the facts as clearly as you could. You are hellbent on defending Supergirl tooth and nail, not allowing for any of the obvious flaws the film actually has. That's called being an apologist. Don't fall prey to talking down from a pedestal, skipper, especially when it is an imagined one. Opinion doesn't give anyone the upper hand or more credibility, and the need for you to proclaim yourself as the be all end all opinion only serves to make you easily dismissed by others.
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
-
Banshee57 — 15 years ago(June 20, 2010 11:50 PM)
You speak with to many metaphorical and boorish imaginative ways, I find it quite exhausting. Now, If you are here to tell us that it is campy, bad, or just plain not that good, I suggest you try a much more philosophical way of wisdom. Any artists know's,it and perhaps you can't handle it, but here I go:
The Naked eye is the form by which we see something and then ask ourselves what it is we are really seeing. It goes back to philosophizers that studied the most lush paintings of artists way back when. We're simply dealing with it here, by way of film. I come to tell you now just how wrong you are in that way YOU attempt to present numerical facts, and all your back up is statistical, perhaps, but you still lack the skill of really asking whether what you are seeing is really what you are seeing, or what the filmmaker wants you to see. That said, a film could NEVER just be "the sum of its part"
You just shot one
there. Duck, there might be another one, oh yes. Then we take that question, and many others, and put them into terms regarding the film Supergirl.
There are very serious connotations in every scene, be them where they're directed, or how an actor performs. The simple logic is that this differs in no way differently from The Reeve Superman, it has tongue in cheek touch to it, but beyond that, we have to consider the intentions of why we are seeing things the way they are. This is NOT an easy task, and I know for a fact you will NOT get it if you try. It takes many days and many studies before you even begin to crack any codes, and honey, you are up * creek w/ no paddle Give it up and please leave. I have worked with philosophers who will tell anyone that this film is pretty damn good,. GREAT men who are among the most well respected in their field. So please stop wasting our times with your made up pedestals and throne and just leave
Selena is through worrying!!! -
TheSolarSailor — 15 years ago(June 21, 2010 11:09 AM)
I suggest you look other places than Supergirl if you wish to be seen as philosophical. I am sorry, but a handful of devotees to a 1984 movie just isn't impressive by any stretch of the imagination, and certainly not worth anyone's time. The fact that your signature is a quote from the movie says it all.
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
-
reecespieceshero — 15 years ago(June 21, 2010 12:08 PM)
Dude, you really are a jerk. I find the philosophical approach quite refreshing, and you turn it down on the basis that this guy is a fan of the film, with a quote as his signature? Dude, a$$hole!
With every beat of my heart, there's thunder inside -
TheSolarSailor — 12 years ago(June 03, 2013 06:13 PM)
^ Go throw your tantrum to the easily impressed, as that is certainly not me. It isn't my problem that the truth hurts you so much. Learn to deal with it and stop being such a thin-skinned puss over it. I mean, my points still stand after you chimed in with nothing but a temper tantrum as a rebuttal.
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
-
Wolf1880 — 15 years ago(June 18, 2010 11:56 AM)
i have to disagree. I say Batman & Robin make Superman 3, 4, and Super Return and Supergirl look like genius. That's not to say they ARE geniusthey just look the part due to Batman & Robin
so i really think Batman & Robin is the worst movie ever atleast in the Superhero realm anyways. -
booksandcoffee — 15 years ago(June 27, 2010 10:58 AM)
I think that we need to realize that, like all films, there will be fans and there will be haters. There's really no point in trying to bring a fan to hate a film and vice versa. The film medium was formulated to be subjective, and the basis of its appeal is the fact that it continues to be open to interpretation. Did I hate Supergirl? No. Did I think it was a masterpiece? No. But I enjoyed it for what it was: a popcorn flick which combines the trials of adolescence with the strength and steel of a super-being. If people love it, fine. If people hate it, fine. But my opinion rests.
-
hitman_1980 — 14 years ago(October 28, 2011 05:17 AM)
It's an entertaining flick and the villains are far more likeable than the ones in Superman 4, which, as much as it hurts me to say, was an idiotic movie.
Superman III is an ok movie and would have been much better with less screen time for Richard Pryor. -
HeartMonger — 14 years ago(November 09, 2011 08:52 PM)
I suggest you look other places than Supergirl if you wish to be seen as philosophical. I am sorry, but a handful of devotees to a 1984 movie just isn't impressive by any stretch of the imagination, and certainly not worth anyone's time. The fact that your signature is a quote from the movie says it all.
Oh for God's sake then get away if these "handful" of fans are boring you. No one is asking you to be here. All you are doing is looking for a fight. Your methods of argument and your tactic of conquering are subpar at best. There is a reason no one is listening to you. Get lost.
"All I want in life is a thirty share and a twenty rating." -
karsultimate — 12 years ago(December 15, 2013 04:47 AM)
More like there's no point. But that's okay, keep holding up your manufactured reality! We all do it anyway, so no need to be a hypocrite about it.
There's a slogan written here. 'Happiness Will Walk Away'
