then Batman would have killed Superman?
-
CichlidAsh — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 04:35 PM)
And maybe you lack imagination, kido. Look carefully, you'll see superman turning his back to the wall.
I went through the film frame by frame and I could not see what you are stating here. However I would have to ask you why would a director if he wanted you to believe that Superman did not kill the Warlord film it in such a way that you would have to look so closely at the film to see that he didn't? The answer is he wouldn't if he had wanted to illustrate that Superman did not kill he would have made it clear he didn't. Instead he showed Superman putting a man through concreate walls and everyone would assume that would kill him
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock -
natemans — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 05:07 PM)
The terrorist is either injured or dead. If he is neither and fine, its bs. Saying he didn't kill him is not that convincing. Plus we don't even know this character. All that the last film did was tell us who he was instead of showing us. But when they did try to show who he was, they just traded all of that character development or depth to just action scenes or the same exposition speech over and over again.
-
-
hamaniomarah — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 06:27 AM)
No its just the logical thing that would have happened, diahrrea6. And If you don't think so, that's your opinion. You don't have to be a dick about it and insult me for thinking diffrently than you.
-
hamaniomarah — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 06:55 AM)
Except I explained that if you look carefully, you see supreman turnong his back to the wall, so it's superan going through the wall. And the original point is what would Happen I'd their mothers had the same name. You jumped to a diffrent point.
Well then in that case, you're a c#nt. A retarded one in fact.
A$$hole -
hamaniomarah — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 07:04 AM)
Look again, diarrhea6. You delusional dickhead.
Yes you did jump to another point that flamboyant added and used that and twisted it, dumbass.
And yes you are a c#nt. And I'm calling what you are.
Asshat. -
hamaniomarah — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 07:22 AM)
Well tough sh#t. Not the films fault you're overly sensitive and you have poor eye sight or have a small brain you cant tell that they are humans, diarrhea6.
No you did jump a point. My point wasnt the wall thing. You jumped to.it cause flamboyant added it. Where was it refuted ? Oh right,.ot wasn't. Its also supported by the fact that he said he didn't kill anyone, dumbass.
You assume too much. It's not that I can't f#ck you. It's just that I don't want to f#ck a c#nt that's filled with a sh#t load of stds. Who wants to sleep with some one who has been passed around like a salad like you ?
Ass breather. -
hamaniomarah — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 07:47 AM)
Like I said, you are too blind and too small minded to know the diffrence between a turd sandwich and a good movie. So yeah tough sh#t.
He was referring to the villagers and the warlord, sh#t brick.
No it is within context but since yuu have no comeback.you claim it's out of context.
Don't care, ass digger. -
hamaniomarah — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 03:53 PM)
Well it's box office say it's a massive hit, and it's cr to coal reception for the ultimate edition which was received more positively, not to mention it's positive audience reception.
He was referring to the villagers and the terrorists, including the warlord. Dude, your insults are lame.