National City?
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC
kylo_ben — 9 years ago(December 05, 2016 06:09 PM)
More like national Los Angeles. Why do cheap network shows never try to disguise LA to look like a fictional city? It can be done with the right camerawork.
-
kylo_ben — 9 years ago(December 05, 2016 08:14 PM)
Why? That's ridiculous, they already established it as LA. They didn't just slip in a few landmarks by accident, they showed the entire beep skyline every 5 minutes, along with palm trees and brown dusty mountains. They just beep up the continuity big time with Vancouver.
-
LithMaethor — 9 years ago(December 06, 2016 01:12 PM)
And then you have Seattle
You're suffering from delusions of adequacy.
Cookies:
http://tinyurl.com/hj7nl9j -
jakkfrost — 9 years ago(December 09, 2016 12:01 PM)
It's set in the DC universe, where all those cities exist. Marvel uses real cities, but the drawback to that is you have to try and keep things in sync with actual reality to a degree.
The first Spider Man movie was affected by this, when 9/11 happened and they had to remove all scenes with the twin towers, including the scene with the helicopter webbed between them.
In the DC universe, they're free to do whatever they want because the cities are fictional, real world changes don't matter. They could totally destroy Metropolis if they wanted, make it completely unrecoverable. You can't really do that with New York without making it into a different show altogether.
Tommy how's the peeping?