Channing Tatum
-
laiwingnang — 9 years ago(July 06, 2016 02:52 PM)
Ms "whoever matters says he's great" "so and so won an oscar" "critics didn't give him bad reviews", etc.. is talking about "thinking for ourselves"??..something I didn't think you're capable of. I guess when these industry benchmarks aren't in favour of your argument, we need to ignore them.
I do think for myselfhence, he's passable at best, remember? ..and the industry is behind me
Yeah, yeah You do know the Oscar nominees in the actor category are nominated by actors, right? I guess they are just bottom feeders who know nothing about acting unlike the big name directors? Please just put yourself out of your misery.and these directors you wet your pants over, they've worked with plenty of mediocre actors/actresses ..Uma Thurman, remember?
Working with big name directors =/= cream of hollywood acting..hence, that P.S. does nothing but declares to the world that you are a brain-dead sheeple
As for your other point, why would I expect critics to give him a bad reviewI never said he's horriblehe's just averageso yet another logic lacking strawman argument on your part,and aren't the critics just bottom feeders who know nothing about acting, unlike the actual filmakers?..you know, according to your pitiful logic -
julianmarq — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 05:39 PM)
I'm a guy, champ. How hilariously prejudiced you seem to be; which is of course not surprising coming from the average IMDB moron.
"whoever matters says he's great" "so and so won an oscar" "critics didn't give him bad reviews", etc.. is talking about "thinking for ourselves"??
I literally prefaced my mention of the critics by pointing out that you're the one who's a fan of buzz.
That's what I've been doing this entire discussion: Pointing out the buzz really doesn't agree with you despite how it seems to do agree in your reality.
Hilariously, it took me
making it explicit that that's what I'm doing for you to try to call me out on that
. And in an internet forum, where everything is written in ink of all places.
I mean, seriously, how stupid are you? Completely, of course.
Yeah, yeah You do know the Oscar nominees in the actor category are nominated by actors, right?
Dude, seriously, start thinking for yourself and stop thinking that the Oscars are the be-all, end-all:
http://www.filmsite.org/noawards3.html
they've worked with plenty of mediocre actors/actresses ..Uma Thurman, remember?
You mean oscar-nominated Uma Thurman? Man, you might be bipolar, you both try to make your point and undermine it in the same sentence.
Of course, I'm not kind enough to give you the benefit of the doubt of mental problems; you're just a regular idiot.
BTW, Kill Bill (vol. 1) is my favorite Tarantino movie.
does nothing but declares to the world that you are a brain-dead sheeple
Aw, now you're imitating me. Well I'm appropriately flattered, thank you.
so yet another logic lacking strawman argument on your part
Define "strawman argument" and explain how what I said about the critics is a strawman in this discussion.
Do. It.
and aren't the critics just bottom feeders who know nothing about acting, unlike the actual filmakers?..you know, according to your pitiful logic
Yes, they are, but, like I pointed out in my previous post in a statement that you decided to ignore because you're a really, really stupid person with self-serving memory who rejects reality (in the internet, for all to see, because pointing that out will never be not funny),
you're a fan of buzz
, which is why I mentioned them.
And stop mentioning logic, it's obvious that you have never set foot in an university, much less studied in a field that actually deals with logic.
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! These are the IMDB Boards!"
-
julianmarq — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 08:01 AM)
I can see you are really grasping at strawsI got on your nerves bad..
The best way to show one is the one getting rattled by a discussion is to be the first to say "I got on your nerves", "relax", "you're angry", etc.
Because it happened to
you
, it
has
to have happened to the other person.
Sorry, champ, I've been having fun here, as evidenced by the fact that, unlike you (who's been scouting this thread all day, every day, hoping and waiting for replies,
always
replying immediately), I only reply when I remember this thread exists and it tickles my fancy.
Anyway, besides addressing that always-funny comment, I'm cutting off. You showed how shallow your point is and how pathetic your debating is by merely repeating yourself over and over so much that, hilariously enough, my first reply is still apt; so I'll finish by stating it again, in different words:
Keep living in your own world, champ; the real world changed its tune long ago.
PS: You brought my gender several posts ago by calling me a "fangirl" and then "Ms". Yet another proof that you seriously seem to have weird self-serving memory issues. Except (again) they're not issues; you're just an idiot.
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! These are the IMDB Boards!"
-
laiwingnang — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 06:16 PM)
Duh! Obviously, you were sooooo grasping at straws because you even resorted to nitpicking about me calling you Ms.shows you are pulling all stops trying to discredit me
You do know you're logically impaired, right? Telling somebody to "relax" or "you're angry" means you're the one angry and not relaxed?no, no!so by the same logic, when you call somebody a moron, it means you know u're the moron?when you called me a sheeple, it means you are the actual sheeple (which ur blind allegiance to critic commentary proves), right? Oh, I get it.. you have an unhealthy tendency to project your own emotional frustrations onto othersmaybe you should seek medical help. Obviously, your reverse-accusation theory has some validity, but only when you're the subject.
..and the fact that my post was reported and deleted is further prove that my previous post humiliated you so much, you couldn't bear to see itbut I reposted it..have fun..
which I notice is your routine here when you couldn't handle the reply..
No, if you actually enjoyed this debate, you'd leave my post there and have fun with it instead of destroying the evidence and pretend that there's nothing worthy to reply to..I've been checking this board daily because I enjoyed watching you writhing in your messed up logic and keep exposing your liesif you enjoyed this discussionyou wouldn't have disappeared for days last weekdon't tell me you couldn't even spare 15 minutes to do something you enjoyed so much? The fact that you went out of your way to announce how much fun you're having shows you're having no fun at all< this is according to your theory about reverse-accusations. You are obviously a really frustrated person who can't even face the truth in the real worldI reposted what you reported/deleteddon't think you can get away with it
###ppl can tell you're all full of it. Basically, your claims that tatum is a top calibre talent has no basis..you and his fangirls are the only ones who consider him a heavyweight in terms of acting. Lack of critical acclaim and industry insider acclaim is a FACT. He's won no awards in both the critics and industry circle, whatsoever your last refuge has deteriorated to some online site that tries to discredit the Oscars, but even that site didn't mention Tatum on his list of oscar snubbed talentsso in the human world, nobody is siding with you this discussion should've been over long ago, but you couldn't face defeatso your last resort was to get my post deleted and pretend you got the last word..I read you like a book.PS. Look, aren't we over this MS./gender issue already?it's ok for you to like men.. You're obviously having some internal struggles (along with alot of other struggles) with your gender preference that you keep making an issue out of that irrelevant comment, twice in one reply. Let me say this again, that obviously struck a nerve
-
laiwingnang — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 05:48 PM)
so you reported my reply out of shameI'm going to repost..
I can see you're grasping at straws I'm obviously getting on your nevers.
Can you imagine how simple minded you are? I know what gender you belong to, I've frequented this board long enough to remember that you are man who drools over men.., hence I call you Ms., DUH! What's next, picking
out spelling errors?
What buzz? It has to do with a group of industry actors who didn't think your man is not acclaim worthy, moron.
The fact that you keep reading movie reviews, remembering the quotes of these critics, who in your opinion are bottom feeders shows you are a schizophrenic sheeple that belongs to the psychiatric ward.
http://www.filmsite.org/noawards3.html < Are you kidding me?
Posting a link to a random film site with a list of oscar snubbed actors that the webmaster believe are deserving of oscar nominations? So you would take the opinion of a bottom feeder over a panel of professional actors?
What's sadder is, he didn't even include your god Tatum on this list. Stop cherry picking, lol.I feel like I'm talking to a logically incompetent 5 year old.
Uma thurman has been in the industry for decades, with only 1 nomination from the oscars, so yeah, she has a really bad scorecard compared to many talented high profile actressesShe is mediocre by industry
standards..So are you saying you actually considers her to be a top of the line hollywood actress? I'd laugh in your face for real. Sadly, Tatum doesn't even get as much accolade as her, so it's pretty obvious nobody
agrees with you about his acting talent.so you're the only delusional idiot who lets your raging hormone decides that he is oscar level.
So really, nobody except you even believe this guy is oscar material.no critics award, no industry awards..not even the list you posted..you haven't shown me anything to show that your claims aren't something that belongs to a someone from a madhouse.everything you mentioned has been refuted. It's just you you you, your opinion, which is irrelevantyou know nothing about acting..you have really tacky taste in actors, there's nothing you can do to prove your pointnobody is behind you. -
TheShawshankErection — 9 years ago(September 15, 2016 07:45 PM)
I want you to read back over this little argument of yours and ask yourself if it was really worth it. Step away from the computer, man. Just walk away. It's laughably pathetic.
Back to the topic though, most of Tatum's detractors are men who are still butthurt over seeing intimidating male physiques on billboards everywhere when Magic Mike was released. Dude's a solid actor. He was great in The Hateful Eight, Hail Ceasar, MM and it's sequel (better movies than they had any right to be), showed serious comedy chops in the Jump Street movies, and was Oscar worthy in Foxcatcher. But hey, if you're willing to let your burning, irrational hatred for a beefcake movie star ruin a potentially brilliant movie for you, go right ahead. We'll be in the theatre, enjoying the film you boycotted.
This signature has been deleted by an administrator. -
tminutti2 — 9 years ago(April 13, 2016 09:07 PM)
I think it's great news. Tatum has grown so much as an actor though and I can see him in this. More so than Sir Elton John. Gambit has been pushed back and Fox doesn't wanna lose him here. I would love to see him and Eggsy going against Julianne Moore's character. If he can transform from 21 Jump Street to Magic Mike to Foxxatcher, he's gonna be really good for this, especially with Vaughn directing!
-
-
eileen-guthrie555 — 9 years ago(December 09, 2016 01:07 PM)
Pretty to look at but man he can't act. I wince when he tries, it's painful. I guess that's why he's shirtless in most of the movies he's been in. Are they hoping the audience won't notice he can't act?