Why shoot it on film when it's going to look like digital cr*p anyway?
-
Krishthegod — 9 years ago(October 31, 2016 11:46 AM)
Hey, i like Nolan, and even i admit his overuse of Hans Zimmer's overbearing music, similar to Kubricks use of overbearing classical pieces, as well as penchant for overexposition can be grating. Objectively, he's still better at story and character than Zack Snyder could ever be, Same with Fincher.
Although im pretty glad Fincher never did a CBM. Cause he'd probably fear being tied up by the studio like he was with Alien 3 -
Krishthegod — 9 years ago(October 31, 2016 12:04 PM)
Dark Knight Rises was and still is a mess. BB and Dark Knight are paced well, whereas BvS just sputtered 90 sec scenes at you without coherence. with BB and Dark Knight, things seem to have consequence, whereas in BvS, even a Congress bombing felt like an afterthought in the 2.5hr miasma of scenes without closure. and most, MOST importantly, Nolan understood his characters a whole lot better than Snyder did with his characters, Superman especially.
Nolan might have, on the record, "hand-picked" Snyder for MoS, but i still believe that was only for PR purposes to boost the film. -
LetThemEatCake01 — 9 years ago(October 31, 2016 01:16 PM)
BB and The Dark Knight are very boring now and each has their own set of plotholes, on top of the drab aesthetics and boring music. I honestly don't know how they are so well loved when what came before was Batman Returns. Yes AT THE TIME the Nolan universe was refreshing but it's been years now and we can see it with objectivity and let's be honest, those films suck. I also don't think Nolan had any real understanding of the characters, otherwise Alfred would never have gone away in Rises. It sucks that he also felt the need to insert or recreate scenes from iconic comic stories into his movies but with no of the depth, action or development that surrounded those scenes in the original stories. Now we are unlikely to see a Knightfall or Long Halloween on screen thanks to him.
-
-
swtpepsigirl9577 — 9 years ago(October 31, 2016 06:39 AM)
for anyone looking for part of the reason why he does what he does.. here:
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/life/movies/2016/03/22/82131764/
IMDB taught me: cynicism is praised. optimism must be stamped out wherever it can be found. -
OLD_ACCOUNT_skribb_Mk2 — 9 years ago(November 03, 2016 03:19 PM)
It is clearly stated in the Code of Conduct that one shall not take dumps on such things that do not yet exist in tangible or consumable form.
DRRROOOPPP OUUTTTT OFFF LIFE WIIITH BOOOOONG IN HAAAAANNND. -
Deathstroke01 — 9 years ago(November 03, 2016 03:14 AM)
Because shooting "digital crap" on digital cameras makes the final result look almost cartoonish. See deadpool and ant-man.
I'm the thing that keeps you up at night, the evil that haunts every dark corner of your mind -
Oliver-in-Wonderland — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 03:54 AM)
Indeed. Ant-Man is one of the ugliest looking MCU films there are, which is funny because they all look alike. And Deadpool was made for a relatively low price for a CBM. However, it didn't look good.
I'm so glad DCEU films are being shot on film. They look better than most if not all CBM films shot digitally.
War, what is it good for?