So Mac rejects the speedster ( sorry I don't know her name), because of rules against fraternization, but Fitz ans Simmo
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC
skepticalmale — 9 years ago(September 26, 2016 04:13 AM)
So Mac rejects the speedster ( sorry I don't know her name), because of rules against fraternization, but Fitz ans Simmons are snuggling up in bed. Does this rule only apply to Inhumans?
-
haxemon — 9 years ago(September 30, 2016 11:14 AM)
She could be both.
The issue was the "in the field" part, not so much asset/agent.
I imagine they don't want shot callers getting attached to assets/agents in the field that might need to be asked to get in harm's way.
Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late) -
Darrylmurphy — 9 years ago(September 30, 2016 01:12 PM)
If she were an agent then they wouldn't need to reference the accords, an agent wouldn't need to be reminded of them to play ball because as an agent they would be duty bound to work in SHIELDS best interest regardless whether they are normal or enhanced.
-
haxemon — 9 years ago(September 30, 2016 01:14 PM)
Fair point and I'm not saying she is an agent necessarily. Just that Mack was making it sound more about the "in the field" part than whether she's considered an asset or agent.
Though I'm not sure if SHIELD agents are necessarily exempt from the Accords - if they were then wouldn't Cap just join SHIELD again so he can go where he wants?
Oversimplification I know .
Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late)