Is that correct? The trivia section says it, and I know he wasn't in a lot, but was it really THAT low?

fgadmin

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC

mdm42 — 11 years ago(March 08, 2015 12:17 PM)

fgadmin

ExplorerDS6789 — 11 years ago(March 09, 2015 02:47 PM)

Where do you think $20M of their $28M budget went?

fgadmin

mdm42 — 11 years ago(March 10, 2015 10:23 AM)

LOL all for him to act like an idiot and not promote the film.

fgadmin

ExplorerDS6789 — 11 years ago(March 10, 2015 02:47 PM)

He had his reasons. He thought this film was mindlessly violent.

fgadmin

pokerkeith2k5 — 11 years ago(March 14, 2015 08:33 PM)

Should have gone with a lessor known actor and took the budget way down.
The movie would still be the same either way.

fgadmin

ExplorerDS6789 — 11 years ago(March 14, 2015 08:34 PM)

If they HAD to go with a big-name actor, then they knew nobody would've seen this piece of crap otherwise.

fgadmin

Panthro44 — 10 years ago(March 11, 2016 03:27 PM)

Agree. Could've gotten those same (albeit quality) minutes from any gruffy looking dude.
When we're thinking about our own brain, would that be a mental paradox??

fgadmin

WhoopsieThree-D — 10 years ago(December 29, 2015 09:01 PM)

If that were the case, he never should've agreed to star in the thing if he was gonna bitch about the content later on. Or at least donate the money he was paid to the victims of the incident he referenced as his reason for bowing out of the promotion. He didn't seem to have a problem with the violent content when he collected his paycheck for it. What a hypocrite.

fgadmin

americanadian25 — 11 years ago(March 19, 2015 08:19 PM)

Seemed like it was a little more, like about 10-15 minutes, but I didn't time it or anything like that.

Film Glance Forum

Is that correct? The trivia section says it, and I know he wasn't in a lot, but was it really THAT low?