Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Huge, ridiculous mistake

Huge, ridiculous mistake

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
12 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC


    Navihawk — 20 years ago(June 29, 2005 03:33 PM)

    With the new FF movie about to be released in theaters, I decided to check out some of the IMDb info about this '94 version. I read an article in Starlog (or some similar magazine) about the movie back then, and I was anxious for it to hit theaters. I remember thinking, "Wow, the guy who played The Boy Who Could Fly, Bug (Uncle Buck), and Chip the Robot is Johnny Storm?" Of course, I was disappointed when it never made it to the big screen.
    Anyway, I found this online recently about Corman's version. It's mentioned in the Goofs for the movie, and someone else may have already posted this in another thread; but it's stupid-funny enough that I have to share it (but I do apologize if I'm being repetitive):
    "Doctor Doom's henchmen come to kidnap Alicia Masters. They sneak up behind her and do the standard 'chloroform rag over the mouth' bit to render her unconscious. And the audience gets to see the standard point-of-view shot from her, seeing the bottom half of the screen covered by the rag and then the rest of the image going from clear to fuzzy to black, to show us what she is seeing as it happens. Pretty standard for numerous low-budget action movies. One problem though. The character of Alicia Masters is completely, totally, and in all ways, blind."
    Here's the link to the page that this is on:
    http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13693323
    Enjoy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      rafe_torso — 20 years ago(July 06, 2005 09:25 AM)

      Wow, you're right! What a huge mistake!
      It's like in that Quentin Tarantino movie where we're looking at those two guys from the trunk, and the trunk doesn't even have any eyes!
      You're only as dumb as everyone else.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Navihawk — 20 years ago(July 07, 2005 07:47 PM)

        I guess you missed the point: It was supposed to be a shot from Alicia's point of view, as if we're seeing things through a human being's eyes, not some inanimate object like a trunk. The mistake was the fact that Alicia is blind so how could anyone "see" through her eyes?
        And apparently you also were unable to see the humor in it. But thank you for calling me dumb; that always makes my day.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            TerminalMadness — 20 years ago(July 09, 2005 07:10 PM)

            Hahaha! That IS funny. I never realized that. Good find, dudes.
            CINEMA CRAZED:
            http://www.cinema-crazed.com/

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              kyleee — 18 years ago(October 01, 2007 05:55 PM)

              Actually, since the eyes are inanimate objects, it is the same thing. Otherwise, if it was actually supposed to be from her view, it would be:
              Spray, eyes closed from getting stuff in them, watery eyes if they open.
              It was showing what was happening from her position, not necessarily her sight.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  alexanderkominek — 20 years ago(July 13, 2005 03:42 PM)

                  It's actually not a rag - one henchman holds Alicia while another sprays her in the face with some sort of chemical - but it is from her POV.

                  • Lex
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    Navihawk — 20 years ago(July 14, 2005 01:54 PM)

                    I just copied the quote that said it was a rag from another website; the person that posted it probably either remembered the scene wrong or heard about it somewhere. But if it's actually a guy spraying her in the face, and we see him from her P.O.V., that's even better than just a rag!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      smash591 — 20 years ago(July 15, 2005 12:02 AM)

                      I just watched the scene with the goof on my version (bootleg DVD bought in middle-east). Alicia (the blind woman) is checking the recently delivered busts of the four when "The Jewelers" henchmen arrive to kidnap her. After a ?struggle?, she reaches for the phone and one of the henchmen grabs her hand and lifts it from the receiver. The camera pans to look at him and he points an aerosol can and sprays a mist into the lens. The view then switches to the henchmen lowering Alicia because she has passed out.
                      If you enjoyed the time you wasted, then it wasn't wasted.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        smoko — 18 years ago(July 14, 2007 11:34 PM)

                        Here it is on YouTube:
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lawHESIl7s

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          eSJayBee — 17 years ago(October 12, 2008 11:29 PM)

                          I'm surprised everyone was able to laugh at this mistake but not notice the one in the description of this goof. "Doctor Doom's Henchmen come to kidnap Alicia Masters" is actually not his henchmen but that "Moleman" guy's (the other villain in the movie) henchmen.
                          Anyway, this movie's full of cheese and it's amazing

                          www.quarter-four.com

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups