What's Your Least Favorite Craven Film?
-
sander1982 — 12 years ago(August 09, 2013 04:42 PM)
I really don't like My Soul To Take, very boring, I quite liked Shocker and Cursed is my guilty pleasure
I also can't forgive him for cutting up Scream 4 to a mess, everything he took out made the movie more balanced (but it's more the Weinsteins fault, still Wes should have had the balls to keep the original opening and all the other scenes) He really should make his director's cut -
swordfish_man — 12 years ago(October 17, 2013 02:10 AM)
@sander1982
I really loved Scream 4. But, there is an Extended Cut on youtube where the person has essentially put in all the deleted scenes. It really makes such a difference. I have since downloaded it to my collection and it now is the copy I always watch. I love it!! You should really look into it yourself
-
scorpion-52 — 12 years ago(October 29, 2013 01:46 AM)
The only films of his I don't like too much are Music Of The Heart and Red Eye, the former is a weak drama that Meryl Streep is completely wasted in, the latter is an average and extremely forgettable thriller.
-
bradwbaumann — 12 years ago(November 06, 2013 04:32 PM)
Meryl was nominated for an Oscar with her 'wasted' performance in Music of the Heart eh? lol
Anyway - I love all his films in their own way, Cursed was probably his more generic studio film with to much CGI and to many re-shoots.
Vampire in Brooklyn takes the cake.
"This Town Needs an Enema!"
The Joker -
swordfish_man — 12 years ago(March 09, 2014 12:34 AM)
-
ThreeSadTigers — 12 years ago(March 06, 2014 04:10 AM)
Swamp Thing, The Hills Have Eyes Part II and Vampire in Brooklyn are three of the worst films I've ever seen. I'm also not mu2000ch of a fan of Scream 2, Scream 3 and Cursed, but they're at least watchable.
Haven't seen Deadly Blessing, Invitation to Hell, Shocker, Chiller or My Soul to Take, and I liked Deadly Friend more than most people seem to. -
the-13-wolfman — 10 years ago(August 30, 2015 11:49 PM)
Mine are Last house on the left (the original can't stand this movie) I do not see why people rave about this movie so much it is boring, not really scary or shocking and has way to much comedy in it.
2 would be Hills Have eyes part 2. -
Danimal77 — 6 years ago(May 14, 2019 05:33 PM)
It sure as hell was shocking for a 1972 movie!! It was not meant to be scary. It was meant to be disturbing and that it was, seeing these 2 women violated and then murdered. Boring? Well, that says more about YOU than it does about the movie.