Poor thing looks awful
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Meg Ryan
curious_chaos — 12 years ago(March 17, 2014 02:12 AM)
Meg Ryan. She used to be beautiful. And then she got plastic surgery. Not just any plastic surgery. Really bad plastic surgery.
She looks terrible.
I feel bad for her. She has to know that she unwisely chose to go under the knife, which, I thought was completely unnecessary. She was so gorgeous.
Now she looks like a fish.
I love Meg Ryan's old stuff. But I haven't seen anything from her since In The Cut. She had the work done before that movie and the difference after is shocking.
Tut tut. What a shame
-
paulfilmpje — 12 years ago(March 21, 2014 11:36 PM)
The work she had done was well over a year after she made In The Cut. Which shows how much you know!LOL!
She made dozens of millions with her movies, had a good run for two decades and has chosen to lead a happy life outside of the spotlights. Yep 'poor thing'
-
curious_chaos — 12 years ago(March 22, 2014 12:18 AM)
Did you see In The Cut?! Her upper lip didn't move the entire time!!! She very well may have gotten other work done after the movie, but it most definitely started before the movie! I'm not blind. There is a massive difference between what she looked like in You've Got Mail and In The Cut.
I love her movies, I thought they were great while they lasted. But it still makes me sad to see that pretty face look so different now. I wouldn't go as far as to say I pity her; she's got oodles of money and success, but one would think she could pay for cosmetic surgery that looks somewhat decent I dunno. It's just a shame.
Like Robert Redford. I love Robert Redford, but the man has hair the color of the rust on my bathtub and a face that looks like it's been for a dip in the pickle jar. I still love him, but he looks terrible.
Does that make sense? I feel like beauty is a gift (it's a gift that I certainly don't have) and for someone to lose it because of poor cosmetic choices is just sad to me. -
Amazon421 — 11 years ago(November 09, 2014 10:06 PM)
I don't get it. Are you saying Robert Redford SHOULD'VE gotten work done? I think he looks great. Ginger hair aside, the man is almost 80 and still handsome.
Of course Hollywood standards are different for women than men when it comes to ageing naturally, but I much rather see someone who ages the way nature intended. So many of the women 40+ are doing things to their lips and eyes and it gets to the point you can't even recognize them! Case in point, Meg. Or what's her name - the Bridget Jones Diary lady. Then there's the absolute extreme like Angie Dickinson. The lady has had so much done, I'm surprised she can even blink. -
Amazon421 — 10 years ago(October 28, 2015 09:32 AM)
No, I'm not slamming red heads. I actually used to wish I had red hair growing up. It's the fact that he's got a full head of red hair at age 80. That stuff is coming out of a box or from sitting in a hairdresser's chair. In other words he's aged naturally for his looks but not his hair.
-
InternationaleClique — 10 years ago(December 14, 2015 07:12 AM)
No, I'm not slamming red heads. I actually used to wish I had red hair growing up. It's the fact that he's got a full head of red hair at age 80. That stuff is coming out of a box or from sitting in a hairdresser's chair. In other words he's aged naturally for his looks but not his hair.
Many men with blonde and red hair don't turn grey. Some say their hair turns darker, like Redfords, but not grey except for a few hairs.
For a man stressed with keeping a natural appearance I believe it. -
rascal67 — 10 years ago(December 02, 2015 12:45 AM)
http://sketchoholic.com/orangebuddhas/images/30513/meg-ryan-caricature-portrait-painting