beckinsale by a mile
-
snepts — 9 years ago(November 26, 2016 02:53 AM)
I have no problem giving Kate the sexiness edge. I just thought judging Charlz by Cider House just seemed odd. Even in a role like in Pearl Harbor, Kate still had the opportunity to be a bit more glamorous, just because the way the film was made. I'm thinking Lasse Halmstrom (is that right?) wanted CT to be pretty, not sexy. Most of Kate's roles seem to tout her sexiness.
I'm not a woman much less Deanna Durbin, but the old-time glam-shot appeals to me. -
Wuchakk — 9 years ago(November 26, 2016 09:38 AM)
Most of Kate's roles seem to tout her sexiness.
Yeah, even movies like "Whiteout" where she's a scientist in the freakin' Antarctic. But they didn't overdo it; it was just one scene (the fridge scene). And I think it conveys a good 'message': Even a proper citizen and serious professional can have an alluring side; and even more so when you're talking about someone who looks like Kate.
My 175 (or so) Favorite Movies:
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/ -
billvagos — 13 years ago(December 23, 2012 01:41 AM)
Both together pillow fighting?
Is that what you mean by "vs"?
Well, I havent this in my mindlol. Maybe the or would be better. But this would be also a good competition, although I dont give many possibilities to Kate. She looks so delicate and Charlize so strong. -
bluehunter16 — 10 years ago(August 31, 2015 07:36 AM)
I'd say they are both pretty talented. They are both great in every role they do, but Charlize Theron did a wonderful job as Furiosa in Mad Max: Fury Road. Hard to say who is better.
Gerald "Coop" Cooperberg -
nikgnorge — 9 years ago(May 06, 2016 05:02 AM)
Charlize because she appears more natural. She might have had surgery but I personally cannot detect it, whereas Kate has breast implants, has had a nose job and her face looks painfully over-injected with fillers by now. In her most recent pics she has chipmunk cheeks.