unfairly branded persecuted in her career bc of the exorcist
-
cryptoflovecraft — 1 year ago(June 19, 2024 04:31 PM)
hollywood would never disown or blacklist an oscar winner actor unless they had a big and meaningful reason to do so.
Yet Hollywood never disowned Victor Salva, a convicted child molester and director of the Jeepers Creepers films. In fact, many of Salva's Hollywood friends came to his defense after he was convicted, so I don't know why they would disown Spacey, even if he did what he was accused of doing. Maybe they dislike him for other reasons. -
lukejbarnett — 1 year ago(June 19, 2024 10:26 PM)
bc they have to disown people who do very bad things like spacey did. but here is the difference that you didn't think about, spacey is a hollywood elite or he was and salva is a no name guy that is not a powerful director.
lukejbarnett -
lukejbarnett — 1 year ago(June 16, 2024 04:50 PM)
i lost all respect for liam neeson bc he just said we should let kevin apcey back in to hollywood. it's only been what 7 years since he was put on trial for sexually abusing and raping guys? if roseaane who just said offensive words on twitter can be banned for life from hollywood then sexually assaulting and raping guys should be a lifetime ban for kevin spacey.
also michael richards was on the view recently so does that mean he is okay with hollywood now? and if so, then roseanne should be let back into hollywood also. but you know what it is though right? it is he's a liberal so he's let back in but roseanne isn't bc she's a conservative or at least republican.
i form this conclusion based on how hollywood which is a liberal company works and also that richards was let on the view after what he did bc they are the most far left liberals ever on that show.
lukejbarnett -
cryptoflovecraft — 1 year ago(June 19, 2024 01:12 PM)
also michael richards was on the view recently so does that mean he is okay with hollywood now? and if so, then roseanne should be let back into hollywood also. but you know what it is though right? it is he's a liberal so he's let back in but roseanne isn't bc she's a conservative or at least republican.
i form this conclusion based on how hollywood which is a liberal company works and also that richards was let on the view after what he did bc they are the most far left liberals ever on that show.
I'm not sure what Roseanne is anymore. She used to be left-wing, then she was independent, now she's MAGA or close to it…I can't keep up with her.
Richards was a pariah in Hollywood for almost two decades because of what he said back in 2006. I guess they're easing up on him now. In a few more years, they'll probably let Roseanne back into the "the club". -
lukejbarnett — 1 year ago(June 19, 2024 10:12 PM)
you mean after trump right? you have to see that this is all political who they "let back". and it's so bad for the country you have george clooney and julia roberts supporting biden when the world is on fire bc of him we have multiple wars going on bc of a lack of leadership from him and just a plain lack of confidence in biden bc he can't string a sentence together or walk correctly or even know how to talk, he gets world leaders names confused as far as saying some leader is another leader, he doesn't even know when he served as vice president,
he lies about the border being secure he just did, he lied about inflation being transitory, he lied about his son's laptop being "russian disinformation" and now since it was used as evidence against him in court making him a convicted felon we know he lied about this, he never mentions the girls who get murdered by illegal aliens until weeks later, which he let into this country by signing executive orders getting rid of all trump's border bills, and get rid of remain in mexico policy on his first day in office, he wants to make illegal immigrants legal just so they can vote for democrats,
he took trump off ballots in states like washington state where i live bc he can't beat him fairly, he puts a liberal biden donor as the judge in his fake felony case and also they make all the jurors be liberals who always vote liberal so they get a fake conviction which was just an error in documents signing not a felony,
no one was hurt, which was just a misdemeanor and actually it wasn't even a crime bc it was passed the statute of limitations, back in 2017, they said it was election interference but it was after the election, NDAs are legal they are done all the time. america has been destroyed bc of him and he never shows he cares about all the people not able to afford gas, groceries, or anything else, he just lies about it, no one can afford to buy a house, people are murdered and raped every day almost bc of an open border.
he never takes accountability of anything he does punishing people and making them suffer everyday.
and he used election interference against trump with his fake hoax new york trial which is still going on bc trump is still gagged. what kind of a debate between candidates can be had when the public can't hear trump talk about his conviction which biden will definitely bring up?
oh and in 2020 when trump only "lost" by about 60,000 votes they recently took a poll and about 30,000 people said they would have voted differently had they known about hunter biden's laptop which now we know is real but they covered it up with the fbi and social media by calling it russian disinformation. that means biden stole the election. that and all the fraudulent votes which they counted from dead people and people voted more than once both for biden.
lukejbarnett -
cryptoflovecraft — 1 year ago(June 30, 2024 04:24 PM)
he can't string a sentence together or walk correctly or even know how to talk
Spot on!
You must have a damn good crystal ball!
On Thursday night, America got to see what you and I already knew about Biden.
I'd rather focus on Linda Blair though….The reason I revived this thread in the first place was because I saw her in Grotesque (1988) a few weeks ago and couldn't believe how hot she was at the time (well, actually I could but I guess I had forgotten). -
lukejbarnett — 1 year ago(June 30, 2024 06:37 PM)
she never got the credit she deserved for being one of the most beautiful and one of the hottest girls who has ever lived. i'm telling you you have to watch her in savage streets bc that was when she was at her almost hottest in 1984.
is that a pic of your VHS copy of this movie? do you have this movie on VHS tape?
lukejbarnett -
cryptoflovecraft — 1 year ago(July 01, 2024 02:45 AM)
i'm telling you you have to watch her in savage streets bc that was when she was at her almost hottest in 1984.
OK, it's been added to my watch list.
is that a pic of your VHS copy of this movie? do you have this movie on VHS tape?
Nah, I've never had it on video or DVD. I watched it on Tubi. -
lukejbarnett — 1 year ago(July 01, 2024 10:05 AM)
i'm glad we can both agree that she was a major babe.
what do you mean by your watch list? is your watch list on tubi? tubi is great except they sometimes censor movies. it is such a common thing that they made a video about this on you tube. shameful. and i don't even know why they would do this bc they can show nudity so why would they censor some nudity but not all nudity?
2 movies on tubi are so short it is obvious they are censored movies. 1 is a movie from full moon features, it's a sorority babes in the slimeball bowl-a-rama sequel and the other movie is a movie where it is so obvious they censored a scene bc they start to show a love scene then they cut so badly and abruptly that it is obvious they censored it.
lukejbarnett -
cryptoflovecraft — 1 year ago(July 03, 2024 08:37 PM)
what do you mean by your watch list?
Films that I intend to watch (not just films on Tubi).
tubi is great except they sometimes censor movies. it is such a common thing that they made a video about this on you tube. shameful. and i don't even know why they would do this bc they can show nudity so why would they censor some nudity but not all nudity?
It's free, so I'm not complaining. They have an impressive selection of old horror films and giallos. -
The Kraken — 1 year ago(June 12, 2024 12:37 AM)
Maybe she played the part too well. I watched a documentary about the making of The Exorcist, and how the public and audience members reacted. Many people thought that that it was real. They thought something was wrong with Linda Blair.
So some press appearences were set up of Linda doing normal kid things in order to ease the public's mind. -
bigbadwolf666 — 1 year ago(June 16, 2024 06:02 PM)
I dont think she shouldnt have a big star.
I think Hollywoods a corrupt deranged buisness. Maybe’s for the best for her not to spend so much time in that filth!
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.