He is 6'7", not 6'4".
-
-
kencr7 — 20 years ago(November 17, 2005 09:45 PM)
And even if you don't use it, there is no logical reason to be offended by it. Some people are so puritanical.
We're talking about the effects of language on someone's system of "values" or "code of conduct". Some people don't use a logic system with regards to that, and some have differing "logic" systems.
A person can be offended by anything, and your use of the word "puritanical" indicates the reason for disapproval is exclusively religious in nature.
News Flash: It's possible to have a value system without religion. -
Vivian_Tong — 19 years ago(May 27, 2006 10:12 PM)
Hehehehehe was at the Barnes and Noble Cafe at Union Square and ordered a Tall Hot Tea. Yeah, he's freaking huge!
Does anyone know if he's kind to his fans or if he's a mean one?
http://www.imdb.com/board/22036069/ -
PsychoticDestruction — 10 years ago(March 21, 2016 06:49 PM)
No way he is a head and a half taller, going off the average head size of a man (8.7 inch) that would make him at least 7'1" (If John is 6'0") going by what you are saying, but given that he is taller than average by a good margin his head would easily be bigger than the average man's head (We are talking 10+ inches), what you are saying is ludicrous.