Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Should Go Back To Making Horror and Sci Fi

Should Go Back To Making Horror and Sci Fi

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
34 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #20

    JohnQuincyPublic — 10 years ago(August 11, 2015 03:47 PM)

    Thank goodness. How many other directors keep surprising their audiences pleasantly, I mean. Not like Terrence Malik, for example.
    What are you saying? That Malick
    unpleasantly
    surprises his audience?
    You're pretty lousy at this empty snark thing.
    I got news for em. Theres gonna be hell to pay. Cause I aint Daddys little boy no more

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #21

      TheBloodyNine — 14 years ago(February 19, 2012 08:19 AM)

      I agree. TBH I really have not enjoyed the modern Cronenberg, his ultra realistic, grounded stories have just bored the beep out of me. They're well made and well acted, but I just wish he made something more engaging, Eastern Promises and The Dangerous Method were just so dry. I love the Fly, Videodrome, The Dead Zone and eXistenZ

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #22

        IMDb User

        This message has been deleted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #23

          Curzon_Street — 13 years ago(April 12, 2012 09:35 PM)

          This is SciFi, and there's plenty of violence, although I wouldn't call it horror.
          http://www.altfg.com/blog/movie/david-cronenberg-catching-fire-alfonso -cuaron/
          David Cronenberg Catching Fire Possibility?
          Unfortunately, neither Margarethe von Trotta nor Catherine Breillat is in the running as a replacement for Gary Ross, who officially left The Hunger Games' sequel Catching Fire a couple of days ago. The names currently being bandied about online (and purportedly by Lionsgate) belong to three North American males: Mexicans Alfonso Cuarón and Alejandro González Iñárritu, and Canadian David Cronenberg (photo).
          All three filmmakers would add "prestige" to Catching Fire, something that, if a Los Angeles Times report on the issue is to be believed, would please author Suzanne Collins, "who is much more interested in quality filmmaking than box-office prowess." Now, let's not be cynical. Aren't we all more interested in "quality filmmaking" than in "box-office prowess"? Really
          If his speech at the Gotham Awards last year was genuine, Cronenberg might enjoy tackling something like Catching Fire. The director called himself "a complete fraud" after receiving a Career Tribute from a group honoring independent films, explaining that he has remained an "indie" filmmaker simply because "I've failed to sell out. I've tried endlessly, since the beginning, I've tried to sell out to Wall Street, to the studios, to the networks, to the bourgeoisie, to the mainstream, to the moneymen, and it has never worked out." Well, if this Catching Fire "list" isn't pure b.s., maybe now it's his chance.
          Cronenberg's next release, which should benefit from the Catching Fire publicity, is Cosmopolis, featuring Robert Pattinson, Juliette Binoche, Paul Giamatti, and others. The film opens in France in May, and has a good shot at getting screened at the Cannes Film Festival.
          .

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #24

            franzkabuki — 13 years ago(April 15, 2012 11:57 PM)

            AHOV & EP are excellent, but after having seen A Dangerous Method, I´m certainly on the verge of agreeing with the OP as it was such a bland, toothless, well mannered, even sort of superficial number. In fact, it´s his only film that´s virtually unrecognisible as Cronenberg´s work.
            "facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #25

              IMDb User

              This message has been deleted.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #26

                JohnQuincyPublic — 10 years ago(August 11, 2015 04:05 PM)

                In fact, it´s his only film that´s virtually unrecognisible as Cronenberg´s work.
                I thought it was eminently recognizable as a Cronenberg film - I just didn't like it at all! lol
                David Cronenberg comments on A DANGEROUS METHOD
                I got news for 1c84em. Theres gonna be hell to pay. Cause I aint Daddys little boy no more

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #27

                  GeF_fEn — 11 years ago(May 19, 2014 03:20 AM)

                  @ OP.
                  I couldnt agree more OP!!! Ive been hoping that he would go back to make some more horror/sci-fi. I dont know why he made the movies that hes been making lately. Maybe cuz he become a little popular and people who had no idea who he was became aware of him with A History Of Violence. Those are the people who dont know much/or anything about movies. I absolutely think he should go back and do what he does best. On the other hand one cant blame the guy for wanting to try something different.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #28

                    coex — 11 years ago(March 09, 2015 07:53 AM)

                    I think it's great that he doesn't want to be stuck as a genre director forever, but I think the problem is he stopped coming up with his own stories. eXistenZ is great not because it's SF or horror, but because he can really write some amazing stuff! writing a script based on a comic book or some other book is nice, but Cronenberg shines when he bares his soul.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #29

                      leopoldfilmmaker — 10 years ago(August 07, 2015 11:15 PM)

                      He's the auteur, not you. He can do whatever he damn well pleases.
                      "Therb68e is no end, there is no beginning. Only the infinite passion of life. "

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #30

                        JohnQuincyPublic — 10 years ago(August 11, 2015 03:49 PM)

                        He's the auteur, not you. He can do whatever he damn well pleases.
                        I would be happy just to see him write a new original screenplay!
                        I got news for em. Theres gonna be hell to pay. Cause I aint Daddys little boy no more

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #31

                          joshuacarpino — 9 years ago(December 04, 2016 06:08 PM)

                          it doesn't matter what he does now because he sucks now. the beginning of his(creative)downfall was marked by a sci fi film:existenz(aka"videodrome for idiots").

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #32

                            preachcaleb — 9 years ago(December 05, 2016 01:25 PM)

                            Gotta disagree. While Cosmopolis and A Map to the Stars were certainly his weakest in a long time, A History of Violence and Eastern Promises were well crafted stories that showed a maturity in Cronenberg's abilities.
                            Seize the moment, 'cause tomorrow you might be dead.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #33

                              joshuacarpino — 9 years ago(December 06, 2016 12:16 AM)

                              i though history of violence was the least mature thing he's ever done,but to each their own.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #34

                                preachcaleb — 9 years ago(December 06, 2016 06:54 AM)

                                How so?
                                We see Cronenberg actually use the violence in the movie to illustrate a point. It's not as, for lack of a better word, "fantastic" as in movies like The Fly or Videodrome.
                                It's real and it's brutal to highlight the brutality of it all. It's gruesome in an unsettling way. Which goes hand in hand with how Tom's own history of violence unsettles his family.
                                Seize the moment, 'cause tomorrow you might be dead.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups