Whom do you think it was?
-
BigBabyDirtFace — 9 years ago(September 26, 2016 06:10 PM)
That Feldman was referencing Charlie Sheen should, IMO, be beyond question at this point
I'll agree with you, but for the reasons I've stated earlier. The quote that's been posted numerous times where Feldman says he doesn't like Sheen is sort of misleading without the following 2 or 3 paragraphs for context where he makes it clear that he resents Sheen for his sustained success despite starting at the same time and going through the same troubles, drugs etc. To me, it seems obvious that Feldman hates Sheen for being everything he himself never wasto the point of emulating Sheen's "goddess's" with his much lamer "Corey's Angels", and for this reason I would take his insinuations with a grain of salt. Feldman seems like the type who accuses everyone of being pedos the way some disgruntled gays accuse everyone of being gay. -
Clusium — 9 years ago(September 26, 2016 06:21 PM)
To me, it seems obvious that Feldman hates Sheen for being everything he himself never wasto the point of emulating Sheen's "goddesses's" with his lamer "Corey's Angels",
I agree with you. Greg Harrison has said on FB that Feldman was actually quite jealous of Haim. Therefore, it stands to reason to say he is probably jealous of Sheen too.
Who are you? Who? Who? Who? Who? -
Lets_talk_about_that — 9 years ago(September 26, 2016 06:50 PM)
I'll agree with you, but for the reasons I've stated earlier. The quote that's been posted numerous times where Feldman says he doesn't like Sheen is sort of misleading without the following 2 or 3 paragraphs for context where he makes it clear that he resents Sheen for his sustained success despite starting at the same time and going through the same troubles, drugs etc. To me, it seems obvious that Feldman hates Sheen for being everything he himself never wasto the point of emulating Sheen's "goddess's" with his much lamer "Corey's Angels", and for this reason I would take his insinuations with a grain of salt. Feldman seems like the type who accuses everyone of being pedos the way some disgruntled gays accuse everyone of being gay.
That's a good analysis. I think it's wise to question whether there ever was an abuse on the set of Lucas, or was that just Feldman giving a F.U. to Charlie Sheen, or was that just Feldman picking up the strand of a pre-existing rumor and making up a lie of a fictional reveal by Haim.
It's possible it never happened. Or maybe it did happen with Haim & Charlie Sheen. Or maybe it was Martin Sheen, and that's who Feldman AND RadarOnline are both talking about and that would be why son Charlie is so effed up.
Who knows -
Dinty_Rules — 9 years ago(September 26, 2016 09:14 PM)
Ive followed this a long time. A lot of johnny come latelys here but i haven't been here in ages so its nice to see renewed interest. It was implied they couldn't reveal the name because this person was very powerful, feldman has implied worrying he may be unable to find any work plus hes so powerful he might sue, etc which haim seemed holding out hope of a comeback being foiled by doing this even though he had been washed up awhile he had aspirations of redemption. Also it was implied people might not even believe them because people think highly of them and they had troubled pasts. Now does that sound like charkie sheen or the fact guy from friday the 13th? People are getting confused with other allegations made by people but these things were not by force but still a rape due to age of consent. It was implied haim felt taken advantage of and now disliked those people but this guy that messed haims head up sounds like he was around before them, durung them, and even now. Also a powerful hollywood pedo ring of wealthy financers where basically if you want the part you will get with them for sex.
-
DramatisPersona — 9 years ago(September 27, 2016 07:43 AM)
I don't know anything about the internal who's who of Hollywood except from a superficial level. I would have to do extensive research to come to even the possibility of a real conclusion. However, if it is purportedly an A-list actor, I think he's providing a service that has a far more extensive reach into higher levels of the industry with its web of entanglement that has strengthened its strands of secrecy which protect him. Mel Gibson was blacklisted at the top of his game, so there's simply no way that only an A-list actor is "untouchable" like the so-called moguls are if nothing becomes of these recent accusations.
I want a unicorn. -
punkgirly — 9 years ago(September 27, 2016 06:15 PM)
I just don't think it was an actor for some reason. It strikes me as a director or producer. Someone who had a lot of money and power in the 1980s.
Charlie Sheen was barely a household name.
It seems like it was someone older and powerful who hosted parties. -
Clusium — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 08:09 AM)
No, it's not a hoax. This revelation came from an actual, real life friend of Corey Haim's, who has been very supportive of his mother, since he passed away.
I was even the first to pass on his announcement right here on this message forum.
https://www.facebook.com/greg.harrison.3958/posts/10154459111072456
Who are you? Who? Who? Who? Who? -
kaydie-fee — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 09:17 AM)
It's also obvious that Brascia is one of several men that Feldman alluded to in his book as having sex with an underage Haim - he gives him the alias of 'Tony Burham' in the book - I'm pretty sure this guy is not the 'superstar actor' in the blind item though
-
Lets_talk_about_that — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 10:28 AM)
And Dominick Brascia has apparently stated that the guy's now in his 70s.
I don't know if that is the same person that Feldman is alluding to though. If they're talking about the same guy then my only guess would be..Martin Sheen???
What other A-list star who is now in his 70s would be on the Lucas set in Chicago?
Were parts of Lucas also filmed in L.A.?
The whole thing is a clusterf$@!.
We want a name! -
kaydie-fee — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 11:33 AM)
Here's what Brascia said:
It's totally not true, the actor/director told Perez Hilton. I'm as shocked as anyone else. He was one of my good friends, I knew him for over 25 years. I started [sic] to movies with him and as you know he was the store [sic] so he had to give approval. He actually asked the director if they give me a part in National Lampoon's Last Resort. And we work together on Busted, truth is he was really, really stoned and couldn't finish the job.
Brascia said he tried to get Haim help for his drug abuse and told his mother, Judy. When he was in his twenties he lived with me and I got him clean and sober for 30 days, he even got a chip I'd like to name the other actors who got him back hooked on drugs. I knew his mom didn't like me and when I went to her when he was 15 and said he's got a drug problem she didn't believe, he said.
Without naming anyone, Brascia said he couldnt be the person who abused Haim because they were the same age when the assault happened. The man who allegedly did it was much older than them.
[Haim] was 14 or 15 and his abuser whose identity he never revealed was in his forties. I'm in my fifties, the guy would be 73 today. If you believe this 'friend of Corey' you must believe Corey Haim lied, Brascia said about Harrison.
Harrison made a public statement on his Facebook account last Tuesday, which was the day after Radar Online's report. I have had enough of the lies! Ive had enough of all the deception and distractions to draw people away from the truth as told to me by Corey Haim, he wrote. What I am about to say is not my opinion, it comes straight from the mouth of Corey Haim.
I haven't got a clue what to think about this - Brascia has definitely been telling people about Sheen in the past, Is the 73 year old he's talking about the the manager/hanger on who supposedly raped Corey or the Lucas guy? And does Brascia really claim that he couldn't be the person to abuse Corey beacause he himself Is same age as Haim? Or am I reading that wrong? That's a deffo a lie if so, he's quite a bit older -
Clusium — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 11:40 AM)
And does Brascia really claim that he couldn't be the person because he himself Is same age as Haim? Or am I reading that wrong?
Yes, you're reading that wrong. If Corey Haim was alive today, he'd be 44 going on 45 years old today. Brescia says he's in his 50s.
Who are you? Who? Who? Who? Who? -
kaydie-fee — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 12:02 PM)
So this is a lie then? I didn't know if I comprehended it wrong, he's claiming to be the same age as Haim when In fact hes 15 years older
Without naming anyone, Brascia said he couldnt be the person who abused Haim because they were the same age when the assault happened. The man who allegedly did it was much older than them. -
Lets_talk_about_that — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 11:45 AM)
Brascia was born in '56.
He's 15 yrs older than Haim.
It's all smoke and mirrors from both Brascia & Feldman designed to deflect, to take the heat off each of them for their [different] roles that both played in the abuse of Corey Haim. The confusion and chaos reminds me of the witch hunt that ensued in the Twilight Zone episode "The Monsters are Due on Maple Street." -
kaydie-fee — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 12:19 PM)
Thanks for clearing his age up, it's not on his IMDb page - I know there was absolutely no way he was 14 in 'Friday the 13th part 5',
I think you're right about the smoke and mirrors. Do have any idea where 'age 42' thing comes from, I definitely remember hearing that a few years ago but not in direct connection with the 'Lucas incident' I thought it was just a rumour or hearsay, is there any source or quote from either of the Corey's stating 100% that this guy was 42 at the time? -
Lets_talk_about_that — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 08:22 PM)
No, I've heard that before about the 42 yrs old thing but I don't know where it comes from.
I think Brascia said he was the same age as Corey because he just meant that he perceived them both to be youngsters in their teens or twenties, whereas a guy who was 42 would have been considered more of an adult or middle-aged person. Shows how delusional Brascia is that he considers himself in the same basic age group of someone so young when he was nearly 30That's likely why he doesn't think he did anything wrong if they had a sexual relationship, because in his skewed mind they were peers.