Looks like RadarOnline is dropping it now too
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Corey Haim
BigBabyDirtFace — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 09:40 AM)
Their info was from a police recording that was taped in 1993 while investigating Michael Jackson abuse claims. From the new article:
Feldman, 45, then told the officers about the depraved man who abused him. Radar has chosen not to name the superstar sicko.
http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/corey-haim-corey-feldman-sexual-abuser-named-police-recording/ -
joemdec35 — 9 years ago(September 28, 2016 08:57 PM)
I don't think Radar ever even had the name. Why would they back off? I doubt some actor could have multiple people wiped out, we're not taking about Pablo Escobar here.
Feldman was most likely just teasing the media so that the perpetrator would give him his hush money. -
BigBabyDirtFace — 9 years ago(September 29, 2016 03:21 PM)
And now Brascia is on record saying that Feldman never said anything to the cops about Haim's abuser.
http://www.ibtimes.com/who-molested-corey-haim-corey-feldmans-sex-abuse-police-interview-wasnt-about-friend-2424203
Why is Brascia denying this instead of Feldman? A whole lot of people playing games in this story. But, it reinforces my theory that Feldman keeps threatening to go public hoping the "mogul" will give him another payday to shut up. And then worry about damage control after the fact.
Brascia's denial here doesn't make any sense. RadarOnline has already said they obtained the recording and
heard
Feldman name the abuser to police. I guess it's a bluff on Brascia and Feldman's part knowing that the only way they could be proved wrong is for radar to release the tape, which they've indicated they won't do. But still, why even go to that trouble? Unless part of Feldman's game with the "mogul" is that only he knows the facts. Perhaps the mogul won't pay any more if he knows Feldman has already ID'd him to police.