Most overrated director
-
activista — 10 years ago(December 30, 2015 05:02 AM)
He has to look for financing because he's always been an indie director from day one who makes exactly the kind of films he wants to make, and he is hardly "overrated" like the OP claims. Like another poster said, the only folks that really know about him and his work are films buffs into avant-garde and indie films to begin with. I've liked his films for years because of his weird, off-center deadpan approach to humor, and the fact that his films tend to usually be pretty diverse (at least a number of his best films were.) I like them to death, and liked his most recent one because it was films in the Motor City. I mean, who else but Jarmusch would make a dark, compelling drama (with a little comedy) about a depressed rock 'n roll vampire musician living in obscurity in an old Detroit neighborhood? I liked itI haven't seen most of the stuff he's made in the last decade (I like just about all his work on up until 2000) but I should check out some more of it.
-
Pzachlen — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 12:12 PM)
Same can be said about Ken Russell. Russell's work was far too Avant-garde ,personal, visual that critics tried everything in power to destroy his work making it almost impossible to get backing. He was a genius. A misunderstood one, sadly. Proof of this is his actors big and small that appear in film after film. Both, Glenda Jackson,and Vanessa Redgrave agree with me. Women in Love is a perfect example of how much ahead of his time was. From the now classic male nude wrestling scene to the outside picnic where Alan Bates shows and tells the others how to eat a Fig. The vulgarity of that scene perfectly describes what and how Russell's future project will be. The first director to show sex for what it is and not shy away from a natural human experience.