Can anyone explain to me, why they think diane keaton is a fantastic, gifted, talented actress?
-
jimellis — 16 years ago(November 28, 2009 08:07 PM)
'Can anyone explain to me, why they think diane keaton is a fantastic, gifted, talented actress?
Because whatever it is. i don't see it.'
wow..Glad to see I'm not the only one.
My hypothessis: if we are told that she is,therefoe she is. This thing she does is judged to be so wonderful; I don't believe it either.
Good not = great. -
st-shot — 14 years ago(March 11, 2012 06:17 AM)
Drab, unfunny, depthless, poor speaking voice, singing even worse.
Just plain limited. Other than dressing up like a funny clown in Annie Hall a one note actress still getting by on Woody and Warren's direction for her to go into the stuttering disbelief routine 30 years in.
A pipsqueak compared to the powerful work of her contemporaries Fonda, Spacek, Burstyn, Dunaway, Sarandon and the list goes on. I'm with the thread originator, a dull as dishwater unanimated bore with no reach. -
-
moviebp — 12 years ago(October 05, 2013 10:59 PM)
So Glad to see someone with some clarity and judgment as far as talent is concerned. You said it Best regarding her connection with Woody Allen and Farrow. I feel exactly the same way about Woody Allen. He makes my skin crawl and I guess is why Keaton has the same affect on me. I never made the connection until you pointed it out. I guess birds of a feather do flock together.
-
Future_Games — 12 years ago(September 21, 2013 01:29 PM)
The majority of Diane Keaton's best work was definitely during the 1970s and the 1980s, films like Looking for Mr. Goodbar, Annie Hall, Interiors, Manhattan, Reds, Mrs. Soff16d0el, The Little Drummer Girl, Baby Boom, Crimes of the Heart, The Godfather, Sleeper, Shoot the Moon. She still played the slightly kooky, zany and off-beat roles during that period but she also mixed it up a lot more than what she has in the last 20 years. Marvin's Room was a great return to drama that rightfully scored her an Oscar nomination, it's just a shame that she's only taken on a handful of drama films since then as she shines when given the right material to work with. She's definitely been coasting for a while now.
Maggie Smith, and god knows I love her, has been playing more or less the same sharp-tongued, dry, slightly sarcastic but loveable old spinster in the majority of the films she's starred in in the last decade or so. I think she's become as well known for those types of roles as Diane Keaton has for playing the kooky and unhinged characters in comedy films.
ROCK STA
RS HAVE KIDN
APPED MY SON -
OnlyRocknRoll — 12 years ago(October 23, 2013 05:36 PM)
Hey, I'm right there with you. I think that she is awful. It's a testament to the movie business that all sorts of no talent, uglies 'make it'. Her part in the Godfather films is one of the most monumental pieces of miscasting ever seen. Moreover, anyone that got personally involved with Woody Allen needed their head examined by a whole team of shrinks.
"ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??!!"
Maximus Decimus Meridius -
jajceboy — 11 years ago(June 17, 2014 04:18 PM)
She always seems to play quirky over-the-top hysterical characters. And as of lately, from 2003 and beyond, she seems to be playing hysterical, annoying overbearing mothers who always meddle into their daughters life. Basically she plays herself.
-
mackjay2 — 11 years ago(January 20, 2015 09:48 AM)
Agree. I like Keaton in the earlier comic film (Woody Allen, mainly) but when it comes to serious adult drama I just don't think she's very good. In Looking for Mr Goodbar, Reds, Mrs Soffel, The Good Mother and others I feel like I'm watching Annie Hall trying to be a grownup. Keaton is pretty and charming, but has little range
-
WarpedRecord — 11 years ago(February 11, 2015 08:18 PM)
I think she was superb in earlier films such as "Looking for Mr. Goodbar," "Annie Hall" and "Mrs. Soffel," delivering nuanced and touching performances, but she seemed to become a caricature around the time the good roles stopped coming a few decades ago. I'm not sure if it's cause or effect, but the Diane Keaton of today bears little resemblance to the Diane Keaton of her earlier years.
-
adamwarlock — 10 years ago(May 22, 2015 01:14 PM)
First off, any post 1984 or so role, forget those. I think she gave up by then and has been coasting. She's just a version of herself. Now, if you don't like the character she plays, can't help you there. A character can be negative or annoying and still be a great character. Some folks seem to hate characters they don't understand or "relate" to. Learn to be more empathic.
See: the Godfather I & II, Reds, Looking for Mr. Goodbar, Shoot the Moon, the Woody Allen films of the 70s and tell me she isn't good. Maybe she doesn't have range like Streep but for what she could do, she was great.
Expansion to your ego. -
rascal67 — 10 years ago(January 05, 2016 06:52 PM)
I don't always believe her when she's speaking her lines.
As much as I have liked Keaton in many of her films and I endorse her performance in REDS, I have heard the same criticism from another poster, who doesn't understand the praise I have placed on her in REDS. He pinpointed to a certain scene and didn't like her line readings. However, one scene is hardly worth condemning her entire performance for, in a 3hr plus film, where she is a lead. I haven't seen the film in years; 16d0but when I view again, I will take note here.
I find Keaton quite a spontaneous actress and while I don't get all the praise adorned on her for ANNIE HALL-77', she is still adorable in her own kooky way and she was much better and stronger in LOOKING FOR MR. GOODBAR-77', from the same year. Annie's popularity, gave her the nod here. -
PixieInChains — 9 years ago(July 17, 2016 01:05 PM)
She is definitely one of those (and, there are many) that when you're watching her, you're always aware that she's "acting". In the words of Lillian Gish - "NEVER let them catch you acting!". Keaton is just not convincing..