John Sayles' 'Cinematic Style'
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — John Sayles
pizzacommander — 19 years ago(November 27, 2006 06:50 PM)
I'm currently writing an essay for a comparative directors class, and I am being asked to define Sayles' cinematic style that many claim he lacks as a director.
personally, i do think sayles (a favorite director of mine) lacks a certain 'director trademark' from film to film, instead honoring the screenplay's narrative.
anyoneda0 care to comment? im curious to hear what others think! -
big_blue_202 — 18 years ago(September 13, 2007 09:13 AM)
There is an interview with John Sayles on the ain't it cool website, I do not see it posted but Sayles explained why he uses a widescreen format for Lone Star, as it was to work with the landscape and help with the storytelling.
I agree, he uses film technique to assist the screenplay, form and content blended together. -
kennycbjr — 17 years ago(May 06, 2008 01:40 PM)
I know that this is a bit later than everybody else's posts, but I would like to comment on John Sayles's "cinematic style."
Two things I have noted (and forgive me, because I might not know the correct film term):- His use of a slow fade, bringing to images together, juxtaposing them. I love that.
- Second, his use of authentic musical montages: someone driving, walking, to music. Usually, beautifully done.
Just thought I would throw that out there.
-
FaceDog-alert — 15 years ago(February 07, 2011 03:25 PM)
Sayles' style is akin to that of John Ford; you don't detect it with your eyes, it places itself within your mind. I once read an article that described Ford, along with Luis Bunuel, as having an "invisible style" that could be mistaken for deficiecy in distinctive form. Despite not employing gimmicks, I feel that Sayles' films evoke a particular feeling that cannot be put down to his writing alone.
Can't wait to strap on your groovy old man.