why so little nominations ?

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Christopher Walken

---

vegeta200011 — 13 years ago(March 24, 2013 09:46 AM)

I'm not gunna go into a lot of detail maybe the responders will but seriously this guy is such a great actor one of my favourite and I'm just surprised to see hes got so little ?
I'm quietly judging you

[fgadmin]

soho0 — 13 years ago(March 25, 2013 01:23 AM)

I totally agree. he's outstanding and deserves a lot more although awards are not everything! he's the coolest bloke on earth, and was superb in the late quartet. chris rocks

[fgadmin]

SexyDirtyTalk — 12 years ago(May 20, 2013 12:59 AM)

I think it's his film choices. They aren't considered "oscar material". At least he's been nominated and he's even won.

[fgadmin]

imnotjohncandy — 12 years ago(March 01, 2014 04:35 AM)

Because then there would have to be a category for Best Walken.

[fgadmin]

rhgdesigns — 12 years ago(March 20, 2014 04:26 PM)

Because then there would have to be a category for Best Walken
You just won best comment.

[fgadmin]

the_teapot — 12 years ago(March 22, 2014 04:24 PM)

Bad luck. So many of the films he's been in were rubbish. Does5b4n't matter if you do a good job as an actor if the film is no good.

[fgadmin]

Ithilfaen — 12 years ago(April 02, 2014 06:47 PM)

Maybe because, just like Pacino, he won an Oscar when he was young and good and then he got so hammy that he almost looks like a parody of his earlier parts in most of his movies.
For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

[fgadmin]

wylierichardson-966-922691 — 9 years ago(April 17, 2016 10:40 AM)

Well, he did win an Oscar for "Deer Hunter", and was up for the same award for "Catch me if you can".

[fgadmin]

dbrockskk1 — 9 years ago(June 11, 2016 12:39 PM)

"few" not "little" GN
suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008