Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. I SO agree with him on Depp's version of Willy Wonka (it was bad)

I SO agree with him on Depp's version of Willy Wonka (it was bad)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    JPSofCA — 12 years ago(June 16, 2013 02:06 PM)

    I like "Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory" much better than Burton's spin on the story as well. It is one of those films, like "The Wizard of Oz," which may have sequels or prequels that could respectfully compliment the work, but nothing can be made to take its place.
    I watched "Charlie" and I did not intensely hate the movie, as it was fun to see attention given to the story, but that's not to say that I treasure the film in any way, as there is nothing to treasure about it. After the first song I quipped its predictability that a rap-song would be next, totally expecting it to try to cater to every crowd. I forget if there was a country song in there, but there may as well have been. The film lacked thought, and merely executed a quick, once-over screen-write of an otherwise classic story, as if whatever came out of the writers, without revision, seems like a "go." It was just another Burton film, where everything looks that familiarly certain way.
    There were a couple of films which had benefit from Burton's presence, but his Wonka venture was not one of them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #40

      nicolehering — 11 years ago(May 18, 2014 02:32 AM)

      I agree too. The remake is bad. Johnny Depp was hideous. He hated children! Why would Willy Wonka hate children when they're his top customers and he wanted a child to win the contest? That was stupid. Gene's Willy Wonka didn't hate children. He was polite to all of the children and their families even when they were rude. He was strange, but not psychologically scarred like Depp's Willy Wonka. Gene also has sweet, friendly, twinkling eyes that seemed perfect for the role. Depp was not meant for the role at ALL. It made me sick when I watched it. Burton and Depp should have stayed away from it. They could have adapted a different Dahl book instead. The Twits is good or George's Marvelous Medicine!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #41

        !!!deleted!!! (19664510) — 11 years ago(September 25, 2014 04:39 AM)

        Burton's version is based on the original novel, and is pretty accurate.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #42

          purplebear17 — 9 years ago(September 06, 2016 09:23 AM)

          what is the difference between the novel and the 1971 version?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #43

            subwoofers — 11 years ago(October 15, 2014 10:26 AM)

            i'm guessing depp is not jewish?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #44

              clownwrangler — 11 years ago(December 29, 2014 04:30 AM)

              Gene wilder's willy wonka is arguably the only movie better than the book.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #45

                Howlin Wolf — 9 years ago(May 04, 2016 12:14 PM)

                Everything is open to new interpretation
                "Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #46

                  dalbrech — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 01:11 PM)

                  Wilder is a far better Willy Wonka then Depp.
                  I liked a few things about the Burton version;it is closer to the book and darker then the 1971 film,and thanks to modern tech some things that could simply not be done in the 71 version could be donethe Squirrels and the fate of Veruca Salt for examplebut overall the 71 film is better.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #47

                    drunkbear — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 02:18 PM)

                    I like both of their interpretations of Willy Wonka. Gene Wilder played it as more of a creative artist, while Depp played it as more of a grown-up manchild. Roald Dahl's characters tend to be a little bit disturbing, and I thought that Depp brought that disturbing element to the role better than Wilder.
                    I LOVE Gene Wilder, DGMW and, as stated, I love both his and Depp's interpretations of Willy Wonka pretty much equally. I think Wilder's is more heart-warming, while Depp's is closer to the weirdness intended by Roald Dahl.

                    • What are you gonna do, when the world catches on?
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #48

                      IMDb User

                      This message has been deleted.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #49

                        Bookmanmovielover — 9 years ago(September 03, 2016 04:45 PM)

                        I heard him say it was an insult and I agree with him. It was horrible.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #50

                          IMDb User

                          This message has been deleted.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups