Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Barrymore's box office popularity

Barrymore's box office popularity

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
4 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — John Barrymore


    TonTon — 4 years ago(January 20, 2022 12:52 PM)

    I was surprised to see that John Barrymore never appeared on any top ten or top twenty five lists despite the fact that he was a popular matinee idol in both the silent and sound era. In fact, his brother, Lionel, appeared a few times of the top twenty five lists. It's often been said that John was the most popular of the famous trio [Ethel never appeared on any lists], but this does not appear to be the case.
    All I can find for John Barrymore is some random ranking at number 32 in 1933.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      TonTon — 4 years ago(March 13, 2022 05:38 AM)

      John Barrymore was also on the infamous Box Office Poison list in 1938.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        MinJeta — 3 months ago(December 24, 2025 08:04 AM)

        And although he was still cast in major movies such as Leisen's MIDNIGHT, he was no longer afforded before the title billing.
        "The trouble is most people are twats or cunts. Or both."

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          telegonus — 4 years ago(March 13, 2022 06:08 AM)

          Best I can come up with: film statistics as far as box-office grosses were calculated differently back in golden age Hollywood in the studio system. John Barrymore appeared in a lot of MGM pictures, and he spent some years with Warners as well. He was, as the saying goes, a "prestige" attraction; and also, he tended to appear in major motion pictures, if not top billed, prominently billed; in his best years he appeared often in all-star pictures, thus while he could be credited when a film he appeared in made money, occasionally he could be blamed when it didn't. Bottom line: John Barrymore was more a respected film attraction than a box-office draw; and yet many of his movies made decent money, some decent money and then some, while many more just broke even. In this I think his career compares favorably with Meryl Steep's, Robert Duvall's and certainly, from across the Pond, Laurence Olivier. Barrymore's matinee idol days were more on stage, in the theater, and I suspect that's what put him over as a handsome lead and, when at the top of his game professionally, a moneymaking major star.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups