28 Months? later Confirmed!
-
Styrofoambootz — 15 years ago(October 27, 2010 06:50 PM)
Haha, well the entire second movies was pretty much written around the kids. There were parts about the second movie that were good. I really enjoyed the first part when the father was in the farm house. A few other aspects were interesting, but I would prefer to see them do another film that has nothing to do with the second's story line.
Are we the dining dead? -
starfuxer — 15 years ago(November 24, 2010 12:45 PM)
Great news! As for 28 Weeks, it was a great action zombie-flick but doesn't compare much to 5b428 Days. Also, I don't want the producers to discard 28 Weeks it is a worthy sequel and with 28 Months, they can fix and make the whole thing more pleasing and appealing.
As long as it doesn't end up like a Resident Evil movie, I'll be more than happy!
"Liberate Tutamet Ex Inferis" -
mrconfusion87 — 15 years ago(January 11, 2011 08:08 AM)
It'd be better off without him cuz:
- Part of the appeal of the story is that the cast is full of relative unknowns
- There has been no recurrent characters so far and I think it should stay that way as much as possible (though if they can bring someone back without being overly cliche, then good as well!)
The Joker: You prefer a magic trick, instead? Watch me make this pencil disappear
-
Siamois — 13 years ago(September 26, 2012 11:39 AM)
I don't think they're even going to consider "writing off" 28 Weeks Later. For one thing, it is a superb movie. More importantly, both Boyle and Garland were executive producers. The movie was fairly successful and they seem proud of it in the interviews I have seen.
But it doesn't really matter anyway because this franchise is built off a single event resulting in a threat that leaves a lot of flexibility for all kinds of sto5b4ries, featuring an infinite number of survivors.
All this means, Boyle and Garland are not tied to 28 Weeks Later very much. They're not even tied to 28 Days Later and knowing these two, they will take the initial rage virus threat and go in a totally new and bold direction. They just need a really good story to make it work and that's what the two first installments had going for them. -
IncognitoElf — 15 years ago(January 20, 2011 08:13 AM)
This makes me so happy.
I'm pretty sure it'll be another cast of unknowns, though. 28 Days Later has comics and so far they've been following Selena. While Jim and Hannah have only been seen in flashbacks, I think (and hope) they will turn up at some point. -
IncognitoElf — 15 years ago(January 27, 2011 09:20 PM)
http://www.boom-studios.com/catalogsearch/advanced/result/?name=&series=399&writer=&artist=
The individual issues are sold out there, but Amazon has them in hardback form. -
phoenixandrew — 13 years ago(March 14, 2013 11:26 PM)
Danny Boyle appeared at a Q&A session at the Aero Theater in Santa Monica, California this evening and he was asked if a third "28 Days" film was in the works. He said at the moment he is giving a sequel to "Trainspotting" top priority and that there are no current plans to work on a "28 Days" sequel.
Sorry guys. -
StylinRed — 12 years ago(July 02, 2013 04:44 AM)
I would love to slap Danny in the face if I wasn't worried that that would cause him to never do a sequel!
COME ON DANNY WE'VE WANTED THIS FOR YEAAAAAAARRRRSSSSSSS
Show these guys how to do a proper zombie/rage flick! WWZ doesn't satisfy our thirst!