If he were alive today….
-
clswells — 15 years ago(July 15, 2010 08:24 PM)
Al Pacino stated in " I knew it was you " a documentary on John Cazale's life, that "I learned more about acting from John than anyone else". John's long-time girlfriend Meryl Streep called him possibly the greatest actor of their generation. Every movie he was in was either nominated or won an Academy Award. Every renowned actor of their generation revered John and worshiped his abilities to this day. Not bad for a worm and a weasel. So if Pacino, Deniro, Streep, Walken, etc; don't convince you, you are unworthy of any such attempts.
-
-
clswells — 15 years ago(July 22, 2010 03:52 PM)
i.e.; box office success does not equal acting ability. Tom Cruise is not even in the same game, ballpark,league as John Cazale although he made a million times more money. Bottom line is that any well-respected actor would laugh at your assertions. But if that's your opinion of his ability, so be it. You just need to acquire better taste and a keener eye for quality.
-
bigbolo88 — 15 years ago(March 05, 2011 08:32 PM)
Yeah, we should take your opinion on Cazale over Pacino, DeNiro and Streep? Why are people even arguing with Proteus? He obviously doesnt have a very perceptive eye for film and I would trust Pacino and DeNiro and Streep on the matter.
-
shanayneigh — 10 years ago(October 22, 2015 01:17 AM)
One of the most popular Jazz songs of the second half of the 20th century is called the One Note Samba.
Great. Now I'm gonna have that song stuck in my head for the rest of the d5b4ay. Thanks a lot.
Working in the movie business since -92 -
jhnyn — 15 years ago(July 10, 2010 02:10 PM)
I think he'd have status somewhat like Harvey Keitel. Probably never achieve huge popularity with mainstream audiences, just because he wasnt'a pretty boy, but nevertheless considered an actor's actor and very respected within the industry.
-
radonner — 15 years ago(August 12, 2010 10:08 AM)
I think DeNiro may have actually been a better actor, but with Cazale having been so limited (alas) by time5b4, we'll never know. I don't think Pacino belongs in the pantheon that DeNiro, Walken, etc occupy, by the way, though I did like his work when he was youngercoincidentally, when he was working with Cazale.
I agree with the comparisons to Buscemi and Hoffman, both of them are superior actors who will never be matinee idol types, through no fault of their own.
As for the guy who has posted numerous times that he didn't see anything to lead him to believe the greatness of Cazale, well, it's your loss. Not everyone thinks that Monet was a great painter, or that Beethoven was a great composer. You're the guy who doesn't believe that Cazale was a great actor. I'm not disrespecting your opinion, though I don't agree with it, and no one else here is going to be convinced you're right. I would simply ask you to reexamine your assessment of the actor and try to appreciate what he did, but if you don't want to, that's fine too.
We'll never know what Cazale could have done had he lived longer, nor Randy Rhoads, nor Jimi Hendrix, nor John F. Kennedy, nor John Lennon, nor James Deanad infinitum. That doesn't take away from any of their greatness. -
littledarkpoet11 — 14 years ago(May 25, 2011 02:02 AM)
Highly revered without question, but not famous or "iconic" on the level of some of his contemporaries. Not because he wasn't as talented (he was arguably even more gifted), but he probably would have continued to be a supporting actor with just a few leading roles sprinkled about his filmography. If he did break into more leading roles he probably would have been sharing roles with Dustin Hoffman.
You're gonna be bad for business I can tell. -
Sparrow-Prince — 14 years ago(July 31, 2011 06:34 PM)
This is idiotic to begin with because all we have is a troll On our hands. Any intelligent person wouldn't sum up the body of work on an actor by the roles he embodies but by the performance and making them something more. An actor could play idiots his entire life in new and incredible ways but it doesn't make him an idiot. Obviously we are not beep 9 year olds and know that it's the quality not subject matter. So if Cazale played romantic leads or action hero's that would be different but your ignorant ass would insult his physical traits because bunts like you have nothing else to do.
-
TheMann3 — 14 years ago(December 15, 2011 03:20 PM)
He is still a much better actor than these ex supermodels with superficial looks and no talent calling themselves actors who rely on111c their looks in Hollywood and sadly some casting agents cast these wannabes over actors with real talent.
-
Conspirator_Slash — 13 years ago(February 08, 2013 01:21 AM)
I think he would be the kind like Harvey Keitel and Robert Duvall - very talented character actor who makes any movie better but rarely the 5b4main character, except in roles like Willy Loman or Solness the Builder, which require exactly this type.
Valar morghulis