Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Shinning sequel

Shinning sequel

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
21 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    billwenham — 12 years ago(May 09, 2013 04:01 AM)

    Uh, thanks for that, I guess, even though it had nothing to do with myb68 conversation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      mtppatrick — 12 years ago(May 10, 2013 05:46 PM)

      Um, uh, yeah, it had everything to do with your conversation.
      With Doctor Sleep, Stephen King returns to the characters and territory of one of his previous novels, The Shining. The novel features the now middle-aged Dan Torrance (the boy protagonist of The Shining) and the twelve-year-old girl, Abra Stone, that he must save from The True Knot. The True Knot are a group of almost immortal travelers who cross the country feeding off of children with the gift of "the shining." Dan drifted for decades in an attempt to escape his father's legacy, but eventually settled in a New Hampshire town and works in a nursing home, where his remnant mental abilities provide comfort to the dying. With the aid of a cat that can foresee the future, Dan becomes "Doctor Sleep." After meeting Abra Stone, an epic war between good and evil ensues.
      Even broccoli screams when you pull it out of the ground

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        billwenham — 12 years ago(May 10, 2013 06:02 PM)

        Dude, I know all of this. You jumped in the middle of a conversation that jumped from another board with the same poster I was responding to, who was trolling the Star Wars board saying they were in a coma for sixteen years. But thanks for telling me beep I already knew about Doctor Sleep.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          cheshirecat-8 — 12 years ago(July 30, 2013 01:32 AM)

          Why would they be to good to do a Stephen King film? Was Stanley Kubrick too good to make Stephen King films, too?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            billwenham — 12 years ago(July 30, 2013 02:43 AM)

            When did I say such a thing?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              KennethWasHere — 12 years ago(February 02, 2014 12:37 AM)

              I sure they hope they bring Groundskeeper Willie back.
              The bitter thinkers buy their tickets to go find God like a piggy in a fair

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                Slaterson14 — 10 years ago(February 01, 2016 01:25 PM)

                I think the Shining is one film that should be left alone, no one would be able to top the Stanley Kubrick version its just too good for any of the hack directors living today IMO. Stephen King bashed the hell out of it because he was jealous that someone made his story better then he produced his own version and we all know how that turned out, he'd never admit it but I bet he was embarrassed by how his "proper version" turned out because it was not only a bad adaptation it was honestly one of the worst films of any genre Ive ever seen.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  guccipix — 10 years ago(March 20, 2016 06:58 PM)

                  What the fck is the shinning
                  http://letterboxd.com/guccipix/list/my-top-100-favorite-films/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    Robbmonster — 9 years ago(July 24, 2016 09:39 AM)

                    It's a skit from one of The Simpson's Halloween specials.
                    Never defend crap with 'It's just a movie'
                    http://www.youtube.com/user/BigGreenProds

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      nicksaviking44 — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 11:46 AM)

                      Most Stephen King based films turn out poorly because King uses a lot of inner monologue. This leaves bad filmmakers up to their own devices to tell the audience what is driving the plot and the motivations. It often turns out ugly and forced.
                      The Coens would have had the same issue with No Country for Old Men, which Cormic McCarthy also left with little external dialogue and lots of actions that needed to be interpreted by the audience. They did a fantastic job with that and could easily apply the same techniques to a King story.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        dungeonstudio — 9 years ago(October 27, 2016 08:50 PM)

                        Maybe the 'scariest' movie the Coen's have made so far is Barton Fink. It gets pretty gruesome and evil near the end. Joel and Ethan are great at 'putting the bodies away'. From Blood Simple's great burial scene to the CIA dialog in Burn After Reading ("Who was the guy thrown into the bay?" "Don't know. He was scrubbed of all ID. Should I notify the FBI boys about it?" "Hell no! Just burn the body. We don't want those bureau jerks causing us more grief!" That's some COLD dialog right there!) I think the Coens are best at mystery and suspense. The Shining actually isn't a bad idea for them. To take on a Kubrick picture that's become so iconic today still? Kinda like going out to rewrite the bible for the Catholic Church. True Grit was good, but at the same time pointless. As George Harrison so eloquently said on a Simpsons episode: "It's already been done" Coens doing a reboot of Damnation Alley with Clooney as Capt. Tanner?
                        That flick could use a modern day brush up, and would be interesting to see the Coens tackle something like that?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups