Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. She deserved to win, not Mirren

She deserved to win, not Mirren

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
8 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Judi Dench


    EJverh — 12 years ago(February 11, 2014 08:48 PM)

    In 'Notes on a Scandal' she gave one of the best performances of all time as a multi dimentional Barbara Covet! Mirren paled by comparison, even though she was incredible as Queen Elizabeth II. Anyone else agree?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      pystol007 — 12 years ago(March 01, 2014 05:42 PM)

      Anyone else agree?
      Me, me, me, me, I do. I was just reading a "Don't like her" thread complaining that she is "a very emotionless actress". That poster obviously hasn't seen Notes on a Scandal. How didn't she win an oscar for that performance!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        rob_ert — 12 years ago(March 03, 2014 05:20 AM)

        I absolutely agree. Mirren was still a worthy winner in general, but in it's no contest in comparison.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Sugarminx — 11 years ago(January 27, 2015 02:25 AM)

          Oh I totally agree with this.
          Judi's performance in Notes is astonishing and one of my all time favourites along with DDL in My Left Foot; Ralph Fiennes in Schindler's List; Al Pacino in Dog Day Afternoon; Leonardo Di Caprio in Gilbert Grape and Ryan Gosling in True Believer.
          Dench is absolutely pitch perfect as the lonely, bitter, opportunistic, manipulative and desperate for love Barbara. How Mirren (talented though she is) won over Dench is just another example of the Oscars whacky and incomprehensible decisions.
          The Oscars do occasionally get it right though. Case in point: Maggie Smith for California Suite. Marvellous.
          So put some spice in my sauce, honey in my tea, an ace up my sleeve and a slinkyplanb

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            BritishFilms1 — 11 years ago(January 29, 2015 09:37 AM)

            She should've won for Mrs Brown and I think her win for Shakespeare in Love was the Academy making up for that. She should also have won for Iris.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              IMDb User

              This message has been deleted.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                nomade-5 — 9 years ago(February 10, 2017 03:20 AM)

                Shakespeare in Love came way before Notes on a Scandal.
                The fact she never won Best Actress is a crime against great acting.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  sesquick-seabag — 9 years ago(August 05, 2016 06:52 PM)

                  Mirren won for playing "The Queen", not because her performance was truly award-worthy. Just as Colin Firth would go on to win for playing "The King" (English, of course). Had they played an ordinary granny refusing to openly mourn her deceased daughter-in-law, and any old Ordinary Joe struggling with a speech impediment, you can better believe the academy would have taken no notice at all, not with such unremarkable performances. In a sense, one almost expects the Bafta jury to back these performances and films; but it's odd how Americans still can't get over their envy and embarrassing sycophancy for this most absurd of British institutions.
                  I'm usually no huge fan of Dench, but I would agree she was very good in that movie - much better than Mirren (an actress I normally much prefer) and the most deserving of the 2006/7 nominees for best actress. Only Sandra Huller in Requiem and Kate Dickie in Red Road were better; only Laura Dern in Inland Empire and Gretchen Moll in The Notorious Bettie Paige were as good.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups