Greatest Actress Ever?
-
vikram8402 — 14 years ago(October 24, 2011 09:29 AM)
des3031
I think you don't know anything about movie-acting. Put yourself in Camille and imagine pulling off a single scene, a single line of dialogue; place yourself in the box and move- and then do look at yourself in the camera. A lot of actresses have studied acting so much that emotional instinct is stunted. Hell, watch Camille and I alone vouchsafe her status for eternal greatness based on that one performance. But do watch her every scene closely; her close-ups; observe her gait, her theatrical body coor1c84dination. Too many believe nobody has moved on screen the way she has. Do all of this!
Then we will talk further! -
nakis74 — 14 years ago(October 25, 2011 01:34 PM)
You are right about "Camille" Garbo is an incomparable actress and yes, a true great screen actress. People tend to confuse screen acting and acting like a ham in today's films or acting on stage. It has been mentionned that Garbo has not played the great classical parts. This is not entirely true since she has played the Lady of the Camelias ( a favorite part among great stage actresses like Sarah Bernhard or Eleanora Duse, Vivien Leigh and many others) or Anna Karenina and other stage parts like "Anna Christie" or "As you desire me". But what really matters is that Garbo whether in "Camille" or "Queen Christina" or her extraordinary silents like "Woman of Affairs" or "the mysterious Lady" knew how to act before the camera (not by just being photogenic) but by totally being into the character she was portraying, and in commmunicating the characters emotions through her face and gestures to the audience. No other actress or actor had that gift in my opinion and yes I do consider her the greatest screen actress ever.
For people who doubt Grabo's greatness as an actress try and watch as many films as possible with the actress (both talkies and silents), not just the well known classics of last part of her career but also the early and late silents like "Flesh and the Devil", "The mysterious Lady' "Woman fo Affairs" (my favorite with "Camille", "LOve", "Susan Lennox, "Mata Hari", the German "Anan Christie", "Queen Christina", "The painted veil" and of course "Camille". Then you will realise that this is a most complete and extraordinary actress and a most diversified one being able to convey all sorts of sensations, feelings and mental states through her acting. You can see the androgynous character (as in "Queen Christina", the tender motherly figure in both "lOve" and "Karenina", the sensual spy in "The msyterious Lady", the felle fatale in "Flesh and the Devil", the modern tragic heroine in "Woman ofi Affairs" the ultimate romantic figure in "Camille" and so one. And on top of that she was brilliant in comedy. A great tragedinne, a great comedienne, a great beauty and screen presence, the Face. Can anyone name another actress who has combined all these? -
-
Agent_X27 — 14 years ago(November 07, 2011 11:13 PM)
I think she was the greatest actress of the classic film era, next to Bette Davis. The problem was that she seemed to hardly ever get really good parts. And many the roles she did get were a variation on the "scandalous lady" character. There was a big dichotomy between her talent and the quality of her roles. That is what makes watching so many of her films so strange. Even some of her best known films are just O.K., and she is so good in them and it makes the mediocrity of everything else even more clear.
-
nakis74 — 14 years ago(January 20, 2012 01:48 AM)
I personally feel that Garbo was the true genius in screen acting and this is where I believe it is worth saying a few things about what makes a truly great screen actor.
Truly, Garbo has that gift to be absolutely photogenic, the presence, the magic to act before a camera. These gifts are not necessarily always what make a great screen actor but in Garbo's case these gifts are also combined with her extraordinary intuition as an actress, the depth of her acting and her capacity to adapt her whole being in various emotional and visual contexts in films.
Sure, she is a genius in "Camille" and that part alone could earn her a rightful place as one of the greatest actresses ever. But see carefully most of her other films and if you are sensitive to her you will discover a most passionate and diversified actress one can ever imagine. Some people complain that she has a limited range. Think of her mature femme fatale, full of mystery and perversity in "Flesh and the Devil" at the tender age of 21. Think then that in her subsequent film "Love" she was already able to transform herself into a tender mother torn between her love for her son and Vronsky as Anna Karenina and was able to refine her charcterization several years later in Clarence Brown's production of "Anan Karenina". She could play a sensual spy with radiance and sensuality in "The mysterious Lady". A tragic, modern, romantoc heroine in "Woman of Affairs". A cynical, yet underneath the surface utterly human prostitute in the German verison of "Anan Christie". A naive, complex young woman who discovers little by little life, love and deception in the underrated "Painted Veil". An androgynous, ambiguous "Queen Christina". The ultimate romantoic heroine in "Camille". a born comedienne in "Ninotyschka" or "Two Faced Woman". Garbo does not need to do ham acting, put funny accents to "impress" her public. She is a creative force, unique, each part even the slightest one reveals different facets of various human beings, different emotional states with which we can relate to She is the essence,t he soul of screen -
-
d_dari — 12 years ago(June 02, 2013 10:08 AM)
She is a goddess. I've just recently got acquainted with her films, and I still can't believe that a woman so perfect lived on this earth.
Felix Ungar: It's not spaghetti, it's linguini.
Oscar Madison: Now it's garbage.