SCENARIO 1: A 14-year-old throws rocks off a bridge overpassing a highway. One hits through a windshield, killing someon
-
/.ㅤ — 9 months ago(June 18, 2025 09:56 AM)
Because in the first case the crime is committed by the kid throwing the rock. In the second the kid didn't commit any crime. It's not against the law for a child to decide to have sex with an adult, it's illegal for an adult to decide to have sex with a child.
My password is password. -
P.Error — 9 months ago(June 19, 2025 03:06 AM)
That was really silly to say.
We already know what it is. The question is why. The premise is that it doesn't make any sense.
It's not against the law for a child to decide to have sex with an adult
Why? Because children are stupid and do not understand the situation.
It's against the law for a child to throw a rock resulting in someone's death.
Why? Because children are smart and they understand the situation.
These two are contradictory with one another. Either the law must operate under the premise that they are incapacitated or that they are capable.
Never lose your desire. -
-
P.Error — 9 months ago(June 19, 2025 03:45 AM)
Do you still shake a bag of leaves on voice call to make it look like you are outside?
LOOK A TRAIN GUYS!
BEEP! BEEP!
HEAR THE TRAIN?
IT'S SO DARK GUYS, I CAN'T SEE.
I HAVE BEEN WALKING FOR 2909 DAYS.
I'M ALMOST HOME. ANOTHER 446 MILES.
I'M IN A CAVE NOW.
HOLD ON GUYS, I HAVE SWIM ACROSS THE RIVER.
THE CURRENT MAY TAKE ME.
I HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE CAVE, COME OUT AT THE CEMETERY, THEN RUN ACROSS THE RICKETY SUSPENSION BRIDGE, HIJACK THE F-14 TOMCAT FIGHTER JET, BEFORE I CAN RESUME THIS CALL - LET ME MUTE SO I DON'T DISTRACT YOU WITH JET AND RIVER NOISES. GIVE ME 5 MINUTES GUYS TO DO THESE TASKS.
Never lose your desire. -
P.Error — 9 months ago(June 19, 2025 03:37 AM)
Ad hominem. Ok you can't answer because you misunderstood. That's OKAY.
Next time just say, "I'm sorry. I made a mistake in judgment." That's all you have to know. There's no reason to be a narcissist. It serves no points in respect. It was only cool on message boards in the 90s. Now, the alpha male thing to do is tell others they're beautiful, not stupid.
Never lose your desire. -
P.Error — 9 months ago(June 19, 2025 05:50 AM)
Scenario 1 objective: minor kills someone.
Scenario 1 legal: minor murders someone.
This rests on the reasoning that minors are intelligent enough and adult enough to formulate intent, consent, and awareness in acts of taking a life.
Scenario 2 objective: minor has sexual intercourse with someone.
Scenario 2 legal: minor is victim of sexual abuse.
This rests on the reasoning that minors are not intelligent enough nor adult enough to formulate intent, consent, and awareness in physical sex acts.
Conclusion: The law (inconsistently) states that a 14-year-old is adult enough to commit a murder, and recognize it as such by the State, but the same 14-year-old is not adult enough to commit a sex.
I do not believe there's any way to say the legal position on this makes sense.
If you have sex with a teacher, and only the teacher is arrested, and you're exempt from any crime because the law says you're too incompetent, then you're not mature enough to be tried as an adult for murder. LOL.
Never lose your desire. -
P.Error — 9 months ago(June 19, 2025 06:31 AM)
That part doesn't matter.
What I'm saying is, a court which strives on an objective standard cannot in good judgement charge a teen as an adult for a murder, which is the same as stating she had the competence and motive of an adult when committing the killing, but in the same breath, say they are defenceless when they commit a sex.
I think teens are plenty adult enough to eat breakfast on their own. And go to the potty.
But, murder and sex? We're at equal wavelengths there. Certainly, a person old enough to murder, is old enough to have sex.
Never lose your desire.
️ — 9 months ago(June 19, 2025 03:08 AM)
