Viggo Mortensen supports a deeply corrupt government of Brazil
-
catpetal-1 — 9 years ago(September 09, 2016 12:40 PM)
Not nearly as amusing as your little opinions, wp. What a laugh. Treating this board as your personal space, friends with someone who pretended to be dead then came back to gloat over your gullibility! That was very satisfying, since I'd called him on his/her bs for weeks and weeks.
Ignorance and silliness, just ignorance and silliness. Really, so many pathetic attempts to
But no. Viggo has turned out to be a pretty good guy, a very highly respected actor who continues to make thoughtful, entertaining and demanding films. Yes, I prefer to like the guy, and I still think fondly of the mockery we as a board made of wp's accusation that we worshipped the guy. Oh, what fun we had. -
danloki — 9 years ago(September 11, 2016 02:38 PM)
friends with someone who pretended to be dead then came back to gloat over your gullibility!
Eh?
I still think fondly of the mockery we as a board made of wp's accusation
Sounds like cyberbullying to me. -
catpetal-1 — 9 years ago(September 11, 2016 10:31 PM)
I have no idea why you want to understand the history of this board. Wp knows what I mean. I'm not backtracking to fill you in, I'm afraid. I'm sure she'd give you her own version of events if you asked her, although she might leave out the way her pal fooled her.
Rubbish. It was the most affectionate mockery, the funniest stories, the most entertainment written by a group of friends. Wp and co could have been part of it - or at least an appreciative audience, but that's not what happened.
And that's where I'll leave it, because the fun on the board died years ago. -
catpetal-1 — 9 years ago(September 12, 2016 12:25 AM)
Oh I see - cutting some words from my post and then attacking them, eh? Too obvious decontextualizing going on there, pal.
Actually, it was all one very happy sandpits with some playing very happily. It was all just humans being humans, and I really don't see how this could be classified as "the absolute worst". Wars are much worse.
See what I did there? -
-
catpetal-1 — 9 years ago(September 12, 2016 01:22 AM)
Thanks for pointing out my typo. I type quickly but inaccurately.
Since I wasn't making a point to you, it wouldn't make any sense to you.
Strange manner? What's strange about it? You weigh in on a discussion which has nothing to do with you, and then call my post strange?
Honestly, reality isn't nearly as exciting as this. -
danloki — 9 years ago(September 12, 2016 10:42 AM)
Since I wasn't making a point to you, it wouldn't make any sense to you.
It wont make sense to anyone. I said celebrity boards are the worst on imdb, you know, as opposed to other boards on imdb like movies and tv shows. You then bring wars into it? Que? -
Grimes357 — 9 years ago(September 12, 2016 11:49 AM)
Last I checked this discussion board was for EVERYONE and since you are taking issue with my friends, I opted to weigh in! Obviously your post didn't make sense to danloki either! See, I'm not alone!
16d0 -
danloki — 9 years ago(September 12, 2016 12:00 PM)
We must be confused to think this is a public discussion board, Sheriff. It's obviously that poster's blog and she gets to dictate who can respond in threads. How did we stumble upon a private blog, I wonder.
As I said, the celebrity boards on imdb are the worst for the drama llama antics.
Back to Viggo, I wonder what genre he'll take on next, and when. He seems to spread his roles out quite a lot. -
danloki — 9 years ago(September 12, 2016 12:05 PM)
You made no sense whatsoever. What was your point? I'll ask again because you seem to like to avoid questions - what does war have to do with imdb. This is a celebrity board not the politics board. And who are you to tell Grimes he cant post in a thread on a public discussion board?
-
catpetal-1 — 9 years ago(September 12, 2016 12:44 PM)
You appear to attempting to make an argument where there is none.
And this old, old argument, one wp utilises from time to time - I merely pointed out (no "you can't post" in my words) that since a comment was not directed at your pal, s/he was hardly likely to understand it. I could also point out that I'm fully within the rules to reply in the way that I did, so to ask "who am I to" is simply to repeat a fault you're trying to pin on me.
They can post to their heart's content - I'm fully aware of the rules of IMDB thanks.
This is tediously unproductive. -
danloki — 9 years ago(September 12, 2016 12:53 PM)
You still havent answered the question. 3 times lucky:
What does war have to do with boards on imdb?
That just came out of nowhere. Are you a drunk poster by any chance? I like drunk posters. It's fun trying to figure out what their ramblings mean and why they suddenly seem to be speaking an alien lingo.
Another question, you laughed about the good old days on the board with a gang mocking Wp. Sounds like dog piling which is cyber bullying. How is that affectionate? That's pretty warped to think it was just for fun, shts and giggles.
since a comment was not directed at your pal, s/he was hardly likely to understand it.
It was nonsensical.
I'm fully within the rules to reply in the way that I did
Did I claim otherwise? Doesnt mean he has to take any notice of it.
I'm fully aware of the rules of IMDB thanks.
Where did I say anything about IMDB5b4 rules? Thanks.
This is tediously unproductive.
Yes, would make a lot more sense if you stopped avoiding questions so that people knew what on earth you're on about. Maybe I should drink what you;re drinking so I can get into your mind frame -
danloki — 9 years ago(September 12, 2016 01:08 PM)
I'm not interested in wading back through the thread to reread your original post. This is a discussion board so in the spirit of discussion, I've asked you for some clarification on WHAT WAR IN THE WORLD HAS TO DO WITH IMDB'S CELEBRITY BOARDS and how dogpiling/cyberbullying in your mind is affectionate, especially when directed at someone you obviously despise.