Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Robbed of her Oscar in 1994?

Robbed of her Oscar in 1994?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
13 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    IMDb User

    This message has been deleted.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      IMDb User

      This message has been deleted.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        cuchelo1 — 15 years ago(June 12, 2010 12:43 AM)

        I think Rosie Perez losing to Anna Paquin is comparable to Julianne Moore (for "Boogie Nights") losing to Kim Basinger (for "LA Confidential").
        There's no question that "The Piano" is a well-made and interesting film, but Anna Paquin's performance is merely servicable. That is, she did nothing to distract me from the movie when she was on-screen, but she didn't add to my enjoyment of the experience. Similarly, "LA Confidential" isn't railroaded by Kim Basinger, but her performance is largely carried by wardrobe and make-up. Rosie Perez and Julianne Moore made each of their respective films haunting and emotionally devastating, and that is the mark of a great performance.
        "Falling feels like flying until you hit the ground."-Tom McRae

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            jcllzos — 14 years ago(July 12, 2011 12:44 AM)

            Rosies Fearless performance is one of the best supporting actresses one Ive ever seen. Ive also watched the ones of the other contenders that year and they didnt anything to do. She really deserved the oscar.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              RemingtonBaby — 14 years ago(July 15, 2011 08:01 AM)

              There's a difference between "robbed" and "just didn't win." It was a great performance. What beat her was that Anna was a kid and put that performance down on film. People were amazed. What Anna grew into is neither here nor there. It's always big competition. I think had Rosie hung around she would have been nominated another year and sentiment would be flying in her favor. But she kind of disappeared didn't she? I wonder why?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                lukejbarnett — 5 years ago(January 24, 2021 03:28 AM)

                exactly where did she go to? i dont' remember rosie doing any movie at all after '93. so weird. its' like she stopped acting.
                lukejbarnett

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  sirjeremy — 13 years ago(March 26, 2013 06:20 AM)

                  She was the critical darling of that year and considered the joint favourite for a while along with Winona Ryder, who went on to win the Globe and gain the lead on Perez. Hunter and Thompson were filler nominations (Hunter is on record for saying as much). It was a hell of a shock to everyone when Paquin won, even though she was in a beloved film, which is what hurt both Ryder and Perez -
                  The Age of Innocence
                  and
                  Fearless
                  weren't liked enough by the Academy for the members to get on board and vote in large numbers for the two front-runners. Plus perhaps some members didn't take either actress seriously. Looking back it seems quite logical that Paquin won but back then it was a big surprise, especially to Winona Ryder whose face is a picture when Paquin's name is announced by Gene Hackman.
                  But yes, I do agree that Perez should have won here.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    lukejbarnett — 5 years ago(January 24, 2021 03:31 AM)

                    what do you mean ryder's face is a picture?
                    lukejbarnett

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      lukejbarnett — 5 years ago(January 24, 2021 03:33 AM)

                      but hunter was nominated for best actress. so who was the other best supporting actress nominee?
                      lukejbarnett

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        lukejbarnett — 5 years ago(January 24, 2021 03:24 AM)

                        dude this is so wrong bc they've given oscars to actresses who should have not gotten an oscar for instance emma stone shouldn't have gotten her oscar bc she's not a great actress and natalie portman shouldn't have gotten her oscar bc she's not a great actress.
                        instead they should be giving oscars to actresses who deserve it like uma thurman. and i find it really hard to believe that marisa tomei deserved her oscar for her performance in my cousin, vinny.
                        lukejbarnett

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          𝙽𝚈𝙲 [🗽] — 4 years ago(March 04, 2022 01:10 AM)

                          Winona Ryder, who should never win anything
                          Agree, especially since she starred in a ****ty movie like “Beetlejuice”.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups