With new evidence, that does bring light on the subject. He could have been responsible if she was unconscious when she
-
amyghost — 13 years ago(January 21, 2013 05:48 AM)
It speaks to me that, at 82 years old, the man has been hounded enough over this and doesn't wish to focus any more of the remainder of his life on attempting to satisfy the morbid curiosities of fan-ghouls who want to keep publicly trying him in the tabloids for murder, no matter how shaky (or non-existent) the evidence is to suggest he did so.
-
amyghost — 13 years ago(January 21, 2013 05:52 AM)
//His story changed 3 times according to the LA sherif//
Davern's story has also changed numerous times, but that fact doesn't seem to convince you that HE might have killed her. So why does it take so apparently little to seemingly convince you Wagner did so? -
parisel — 13 years ago(March 07, 2013 08:55 PM)
Then why didn't the Captain go and help her himself? No matter what your boss says, you don't just say Yes Sir and let a woman dieAnd besides, he was the Captain. His word is law on board So he'd get fired. So what? He could have gotten another job back then..So he's good for manslaughter too. .I don't believe him, he's just trying to sell a book.
We'll never know what happened.
I guess it's like looking at clouds. You see one thing and I see anot5b4her. Peace. -
justajobtodo — 13 years ago(March 08, 2013 03:27 PM)
Davern did not know she was in the water, he was in the Salon with Wagner having drinks
SSR (supported by supplemental report).
There was no stateroom arguement
SSR.
There was no loud music
SSR.
There was no screaming for help
SSR and Wayne is a proven liar.
There was no delay in the search at 1:30 a.m.
SSR.
Wood left the boat with the dinghy and drifted with it until the end because they both ended up in the same location but seperated
SSR. -
justajobtodo — 13 years ago(March 09, 2013 05:21 AM)
For the record I have never changed my screen name, if you think I have PROVE IT.
I came here in peace and was immediately attacked by one person with many screen names.
This person only attacks and does not contribute.
This person always thinks posters who have a different view are haters of NW and brings up past experiences obviousley brought about by the obvious.
When challenged and faced with the facts this person attacks and then switches to another screen name and pretends to have knowledge.
So, who is the troll?
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein -
justajobtodo — 13 years ago(March 09, 2013 07:31 AM)
Nobody is reading it Jocko Slobbo!
WTF do you think nobody talks to you and avoids and ignores you
they stop talking to you because they see I am right
YOU PROVE DIFFERENT!
If there is no one else here then it's just you and I, me with my only ID and you with your many. My posting history speaks volumes. -
justajobtodo — 13 years ago(March 10, 2013 07:19 AM)
OH REALLY? Then why have you slithered on to every Yahoo group and Face Book group for both Natalie and RJ under alias names?
YOU ARE OBSESSED WITH BOTH OF THEM! You always were and you always will be!
Dont deny it because YOU ARE THE LIAR!
If you think pasting and copying my comments back to me makes you sound important you are wrong? Where did you learn that from? Your para legal secretaries up there in no man's land?
The liar is you buddy!
Conjur up another dumb screen name to agree with you now!
Laughable so laughable -
justajobtodo — 13 years ago(March 11, 2013 09:22 AM)
I call the CITY AND REPORT YOUR LAZY ASS!
Still got electricity up there?
Still running onto the computer in the middle of the night to post
Your para legal secretaries up there in no man's land?
does your family and colleagues at work
The wife went to bed early so you could sneak onto the computer
Whats up? Your wife working a double or did she finally leave your psychotic ass? You still trolling on taxpayer's dimes?
skeered that I will expose you
I think I hear your wife calling you. Better get off the computer before she spanks your chapped little bum.
DOPPEL/NOIR ARE YOU AN INTERNET STALKER? THE ABOVE IS A SURE INDICATOR AND PATTERN OF IT. CLEARLY YOU ARE OBSESSED WITH THIS PERSON WHO IS CLEARLY AND LITERALLY NOT ME. DO YOU REALIZE HOW FAR INTERNET STALKING LAWS HAVE COME? I HOPE FOR YOUR SAKE THAT THE PERSON YOU ARE OBSESSED WITH IS NOT MONITORING YOUR POSTS, THE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOU COULD BE GRIM. I DON'T WANT TO BE YOUR NEXT VICTIM THEREFORE YOU ARE ON IGNORE, ANYTHING YOU DO OR SAY IS ON YOU, UNLIKE THE PERSON YOU ARE OBSESSED WITH I WILL TAKE ACTION, SO GO A HEAD DIG INTO MY LIFE , I DARE YOU. INTERNET FODDER IS ONE THING, STALKING IS CRIMINAL.
TO OTHERS WHO READ THIS, TAKE CAUTION! -
justajobtodo — 13 years ago(March 12, 2013 04:16 AM)
This post goes out to everyone other than Doppel/Noir and the dozens of screen names she has.
It's obvious by her post and in her own words that she commited some personal stalking, and now in her own words she has implicated 3 other people. Be that as it may it seems that this happened in the past, I wonder how long ago? Be that as it may by her own words she is still stalking this person to this day. It seems her obsession with this person is infinite, if I were this person I would take caution or action. This is not normal, and I am getting all this from just a few posts, I wonder just how far she has gone.
If anyone has any past history info on this please PM me. I am more curious when the above took place.