Robert Refuses to Talk to Investigators in 2013
-
Arcturus1980 — 13 years ago(February 02, 2013 03:13 PM)
Yes, very trollish of me to a) insist on logic and b) basically confine myself to the subject.
Note the sarcasm and try again.
Not one quotably cogent and necessary line out of you, huh Amy?
It is not becoming of you to remark on class. This thread is a testament to that. Forswearing ab68ll decency, you zealously cheat the argument, thereby caring not a rat's ass for the great Natalie Wood. For that matter, your transparent defense of Robert Wagner is hardly respectful of him. Given your demonstrable character, I shudder to imagine what double-dealings and sordid passions you are busying yourself with day-to-day. -
Arcturus1980 — 13 years ago(February 07, 2013 08:46 PM)
"Well, the fact that you self-identify as a 'submissive' does explain a lot, Dan."
My sexual predilections are not so telling, actually.
On the other hand, your avoidance of the subject is a tacit concession. Typically graceless of you. -
amyghost — 13 years ago(February 11, 2013 04:10 AM)
yawn<
Sorry, Dan, but that's the reaction that mention of your "sexual predilections" calls forth from me.
My avoidance of what subject, Dan? Your "sexual predilections"? Am I tacitly conceding to you your right to your 'predilections'? If so, how very broadminded of me. Yay me.
Actually, considering2000 the chucklesome ripostes I could make to your rather off-the-wall bringing up of your "sexual predilections", I consider it quite graceful of me in the extreme to refrain nobly from rising to such well-nigh irresitible comic bait. -
Arcturus1980 — 13 years ago(February 11, 2013 06:11 PM)
"My avoidance of what subject, Dan? Your "sexual predilections"?"
Amy, I can see you keeping all manor of debauched company where such a cheap tactic is par for the course, but it will not do here. To my knowledge, the IMDb has no board for my sexual predilections. The subject here is Robert Wagner. You have well and truly lost your ass.
By the way, whatever became of your knight in a gimp suit? He only handed in his signed confession of idiocy, while adding an exclamation mark to yours. Are you waiting on a more useful gimp with the intelligence of, say, a moron? -
Arcturus1980 — 13 years ago(February 12, 2013 08:26 PM)
Amy,
Too much reality for you, hmmm?
Your cowardice is your own. No ifs, ands, or buts about that.
For weeks now you have disgraced the memory of Natalie Wood, of all people. You have neither made a cogent and necessary point, nor have you posed a sensible question. All the while maintaining your graceless denial of the flat truth. So, there you have it, my
reasoning
, which
substantiates
my
opinion
: you're a moron in plain English. Do you get how that works?
I have washed my hands of 7ecyou, Amy. -
amyghost — 13 years ago(February 14, 2013 06:26 AM)
The only disgrace to the memory of Natalie Wood are the hordes of mouth-breathing casket-flies like yourself, whose only attraction to the woman was strictly post-mortem, and then only so you could heap calumny on her widower and surviving family members, Dan.
//it bears none of the qualities I so reasonably demand of you.//
Luckily for you Dan, I make no demands, 'reasonable' or otherwise, of "quality" from yourself. I tend not to demand of others those traits which they so conspicuously lack.
// I have washed my hands of you, Amy.//
Be sure to dispose of the paper toweling in the proper place, Dan, when you're done washing up. And do try to have a nice flounce, Dan. I'm sure there are many other IMDb threads out there in dire need of your unique blend of vapidity, rant, and utter lack of content.
Actually, not that unique Dan; you've come across as a pretty strictly garden-variety, rank-and-file internet forum troll thus far.