innocent
-
Amari-Sali — 17 years ago(June 11, 2008 06:43 PM)
age of consent is what people?
and lets remember what The Boondocks said "did she move?" If not she liked it and the constitution states rights to pursue happiness and if being pissed on by R. Kelly equals her happiness then leave her alone lol plus last time i checked he didn't rape no one
Only a fool is constantly wanted, normal people have to work hard to be interesting -
Amari-Sali — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 12:22 PM)
I'm not defending him I'm just thinking outside the box it wasn't rape i never heard rape charges and really if he is/was a pedophile I doubt he is going to jeopardize his career by continuing such odd interest further But if he is a pedophile i'm sure he would just wait until they are legal
Only a fool is constantly wanted, normal people have to work hard to be interesting -
great_ap3 — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 02:47 PM)
my theory is he got away with it because the girl in the video is denying its her etc plus he's a celeb (always expect them to never see serious prison time)
if the "victim" (willing or not he's still a pedo & btw this is not his first pedo incident..know the history before talking) refuses to cooperate and all they have is a tape..not much evidenceit's hard to convict..tho he should be castrated by now for videotape alone if the law wasn't so rediculous at protecting the 2000criminalyou can tell the jury didn't even try to serve justice here..it took thema day to decide? good god..they didn't even care..he's a celeb so automatically innocent
i'm not even mad or shocked by the newsi knew he wouldn't get in much (if any) trouble..it's the same old story repeated -
Amari-Sali — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 03:30 PM)
I know the history mostly cause i was a fan until after Chocolate Factory what I don't fully understand is the situation
Though the girl was the niece of his associate how did they meet?
Did he know the girl before the acts?
Did the girl lie and say she was older?
and all other sort of questions the I would know if i was more on the ball but i thought the trial was thrown out long ago I mean really what purpose is there to delay a trial 6 years?
IMO I'm comparing him to Michael this is his last chance he needs to start checking IDs or else start looking up the consent law or else his ass will be trapped in the closest with a guy named Bubba.
Only a fool is constantly wanted, normal people have to work hard to be interesting -
RedSkin_Gyal — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 07:28 PM)
Hes innocent knew it anyways the man that was in the video didnt have a mole on his back and R.Kelly has one on his back which proves he's not guilty and thats a fact all 14 child pornography charges are dropped!
Denyse -
AngelSHEBAMRomanov — 17 years ago(June 14, 2008 02:26 PM)
Hes innocent knew it anyways the man that was in the video didnt have a mole on his back and R.Kelly has one on his back which proves he's not guilty and thats a fact all 14 child pornography charges are dropped!
That is a CRAP reason. Ever heard of makeup? Maybe it doesn't show up on a camera. There are TONS of reasons against your puny excuse for dropping charges.
If you think he's innocent for a FACT at least use some substantial evidence.
Born in the U.S.A.
Springsteen's my boy!
Future member of the U.S. Army -
RedSkin_Gyal — 17 years ago(June 15, 2008 09:02 AM)
First of all theres nuff man that can pull off trying to look like him u stupid dunce azz..lemme ask u this how can u cover up a mole with makeup from the size of R.Kellys ur lame azz excuse is so wack.
Denyse