innocent
-
RedSkin_Gyal — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 07:28 PM)
Hes innocent knew it anyways the man that was in the video didnt have a mole on his back and R.Kelly has one on his back which proves he's not guilty and thats a fact all 14 child pornography charges are dropped!
Denyse -
AngelSHEBAMRomanov — 17 years ago(June 14, 2008 02:26 PM)
Hes innocent knew it anyways the man that was in the video didnt have a mole on his back and R.Kelly has one on his back which proves he's not guilty and thats a fact all 14 child pornography charges are dropped!
That is a CRAP reason. Ever heard of makeup? Maybe it doesn't show up on a camera. There are TONS of reasons against your puny excuse for dropping charges.
If you think he's innocent for a FACT at least use some substantial evidence.
Born in the U.S.A.
Springsteen's my boy!
Future member of the U.S. Army -
RedSkin_Gyal — 17 years ago(June 15, 2008 09:02 AM)
First of all theres nuff man that can pull off trying to look like him u stupid dunce azz..lemme ask u this how can u cover up a mole with makeup from the size of R.Kellys ur lame azz excuse is so wack.
Denyse -
josephadamlang — 14 years ago(June 03, 2011 01:20 AM)
Is he? Look at this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn-q3-16isM
He may be talented, but why does he keep dong it?!