I love this man.
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Paul McCartney
They_Call_Me_Emily — 12 years ago(April 19, 2013 04:48 PM)
That is all.
He is extremely good-looking still. I love his personality and humour. He is enormously talented. And he has principles and good morals, which is unlikely for any guy who was such a huge star. Look to other Beatles or the Rolling Stones for comparison. All little boys in old men's bodies. This guy has always been mature and focused.
Worthy of his knighthood.
I adore him. -
cbartal — 12 years ago(April 19, 2013 11:06 PM)
What did Ringo ever do that would place him under Paul on your integrity scale?
Hey, he's not the brilliant songwriter that Paul is, but that is not what you were focusing on.
Ringo has always been able to hold his head high, he has always taken every high road. He has been a pillar of stability as a Beatle and ex Beatle for 50 years.
You make this statement about Paul in terms of comparing him to the other Beatles. That's a pretty narrow focus group. So I just wonder what Ringo has done to place him beneath Paul according to your standards? -
They_Call_Me_Emily — 12 years ago(May 20, 2013 02:13 PM)
Sorry, guys. All The Beatles seem like lovely people - though John seemed a bit troubled and could hit out at other people - but I meant in comparison to the Rolling Stones, which seem a bit immature to me.
Ringo is great.
I used to like George but loyalty to partners was not a strong point. I read Pattie Boyd's biography and he could be quite cruel. He also got obsessed with meditation, to the neglect of many other things. Overall, he still 7ecseems cool.
And John was very talented but he could be mean.
All in all, they were a great group and they seemed like solid people.
I just especially like Paul. You could count Ringo in, too. They are thoroughly nice guys, there is nothing spoiled or mean about them, they were not involved in any scandals. -