Selective denial is what the denyers of RUSSIA and AIDS have…
-
AprilFool29 — 10 years ago(June 26, 2015 06:25 PM)
You stayed off the board to WAIT for her exhumation?! As if that's the sole reason you were on here? Man you're weird.
Btw - look up meaning of "autobiography". I'm not Brittany, so I can't write her "autobiography".
-
AprilFool29 — 10 years ago(June 26, 2015 06:20 PM)
Huh? Man you nuts! I don't recall ANY autopsy pics smuggled. Certainly not from me. I don't work for the coroner. Or anywhere remotely near! I think you have the wrong person!. Furthermore, anyone who DOES work for the coroner, would be taking an extreme risk smuggling pics. In other words NO. As far as I know, there are NO pics like that, and I highly resent you assuming I'd exploit her in that way.
Years ago, I had considered doing an art project based off pics of her. A bio? No. I'm not that good a writer. And what if I had? Is there something wrong with that? I think anything would be better than that godawful biopic that aired on Lifetime! But to each their own.
I personally wouldn't get a red cent if Angelo won his case. I'm not that close with him. Again, I think you have the wrong person. And NO I wasn't lying about her exhumation. At the time I posted about it, it looked like a very real probability and in fact was sure it would happen. I'm glad it's not looking to be the case now. Call me names all you want, but no I did not lie.
I am blocking you now, so that I no longer have to read your crap. I'm not the type of person you accuse me of being, and I'm sick of you. You sound like a beep nutcase. -
BlueWatersWhiteDeath — 10 years ago(June 26, 2015 08:19 PM)
rightbOOb,
If you are not who I thought you were, then I apologize. It is just strange that another user disappeared right when you started to post last year and the posts were identical.
You are correct and it should have been a biography and not autobiography.
As for the exhumation, the person that mistaken you for would have posted that kind of crap every other day just to stir things up here.
Again, I apologize for the mistake that I have made. -
BrittanyMurphyRIP — 10 years ago(June 27, 2015 12:24 AM)
It is just strange that another user disappeared right when you started to post last year and the posts were identical.
They weren't identical and they overlapped, but anyway that other user has moved on. For that reason, and since it is acknowledged that there will be no exhumation, I suggest you do the same. -
!!!deleted!!! (5862285) — 11 years ago(September 16, 2014 08:51 PM)
My issue with believing the whole Brittany being on drugs, being promiscuous, etc. is there was never any proof of it.
Everyone else that I can think of star-wise who is/was accused of being a drug user or being slutty almost always ends up "caught" somehow. I always wondered with the "blind" rumors supposedly about Brittany whether someone was trying to derail her career for some reason. -
classalpha-932-68465 — 11 years ago(October 10, 2014 03:19 PM)
there is no "Blind Item" for the Russian angle you idiot the blog discussing the Igor Desyatnikov party IN Russia is from several sources IN Russia and Her Death had been reported in the Russian media as having Died after attending the party and that She Died upon returning to the U.S. and BTW She contracted HIV several years before Her Death and because of Hers and Her "mother's" fears didn't treat it after which the HIV developed into AIDS
-
classalpha-932-68465 — 10 years ago(June 20, 2015 12:04 PM)
how can someone "prove" sexual promiscuity? As well there numerous Blind Items about an actress who voiced cartoons (KOTH?) being a fan of anonymous sex which readers had attributed to Her
BTW She didn't have a "career" to derail after 2005 She did nothing except the occasional Indie flick or Appear at Fashion Shows either with Joe e"M" or SKUM -
DivingIntheBlue — 10 years ago(September 03, 2015 11:40 PM)
I'm generally not one to clutch my pearls over internet dumb fu*kery but NewPilgrim is correct. This board is chalked full of more poorly written and atrociously spelled nuttery than any JFK assassination or Illuminati message board. This isn't hysterical hyperbole but I genuinely fear that some people here and wandering around in the world.
This idea that there's always a conspiracy to explain everything that freaks you out is utterly insane. Sometimes people get sick and die. Even young famous people you like! Bacteria, viruses and drugs don't give a damn if you're rich and famous. The truth remains that the universe, life or whatever is often seemingly random and uncontrollable. That doesn't mean phantom bogey men are pulling the strings and taking people out. It also doesn't mean that every autopsy is botched and "real" causes of death are suppressed. That idea is laughable because a large number of people would not only have to agree to be part of such a scheme but also agree to risk their own career and safety all while keeping their mouth shut.
What's most maddening about this kind behavior is that it's not even about the subject of the dastardly alleged crime. It's all about some paranoid joker who wants to stroke their own ego by smugly announcing that they cracked some code or can see beyond see beyond the "official" versions of events (often backed up by irrefutable facts and science) that the "sheeple" readily believe. It's a sick and sad act that intelligent people should really start ignoring.
And by the way, the word is "denier". Drop the y and add and i. Basic grade school grammar, man. -
BrittanyMurphyRIP — 10 years ago(September 19, 2015 12:17 PM)
This board is chalked full of more poorly written and atrociously spelled nuttery than any JFK assassination or Illuminati message board.
Classalpha's writing style aside, what's that in reference to?
This idea that there's always a conspiracy to explain everything that freaks you out is utterly insane.- What alleged conspiracy are you talking about?
- As a conspiracy is two or more people planning to engineer an outcome their advantage, most events in the world do indeed involve some conspiracy.
The truth remains that the universe, life or whatever is often seemingly random and uncontrollable.
Yes, sometimes two people die having shown signs of being poisoned, in the care of someone who stands to benefit financially from at least one of their deaths and shows resistance to summoning medical aid on their behalf.
That doesn't mean phantom bogey men are pulling the strings and taking people out.
Again, who on this board is alleging anything like that?
It also doesn't mean that every autopsy is botched and "real" causes of death are suppressed.
No, not all autopsies fail to test for poisons. Although apparently any autopsy done in LA County will do so unless an allegation citing a specific poison is made beforehand
2000
-
BlueWatersWhiteDeath — 10 years ago(September 19, 2015 10:23 PM)
Good to hear from you BrittanyMurphyRIP
Just have a question for you about your post above and it is this - you stated:
Yes, sometimes two people die having shown signs of being poisoned, in the care of someone who stands to benefit financially from at least one of their deaths and shows resistance to summoning medical aid on their behalf.
Now, if this is in reference to Bertolotti's accusations that Sharon poisoned Brittany and Simon, I would like for you to explain how Sharon would have benefited from Brittany's and Simon's death. From what I have seen, Sharon would have gotten Brittany's support alive or dead so she did not benefit from her death one way or another. In fact, the only person that stands to benefit from Brittany's death is Bertolotti and that is if he can prove that Sharon had something to do with Brittany's death which he has been doing ever since her death.
Also, on your Justice for Brittany board, you posted a question about why Brittany stopped using the Bertolotti name and went with Murphy and I have a question on that - when Brittany changed her name from Bertolotti, how close was Bertolotti to getting out of jail or was he already out? -
BrittanyMurphyRIP — 10 years ago(September 20, 2015 02:35 AM)
I would like for you to explain how Sharon would have benefited from Brittany's and Simon's death
again. OK, again, Sharon was the beneficiary of Brittany's will. An inheritance which was constantly shrinking due to the decline in Brittany's career, due to her known prescription drug addiction. An addiction for which she refused to seek help for fear of bad publicity further accelerating the decline. As beneficiary, Sharon had a motive to ensure that Brittany's death, which she would have expected anyway the way things were going, came sooner. As for a motive for killing Simon, I can only speculate - either she would have stood to gain from that financially, or maybe feared he would talk, or both.
In fact, the only person that stands to benefit from Brittany's death is Bertolotti and that is if he can prove that Sharon had something to do with Brittany's death which he has been doing ever since her death.
Plainly nonsense, Sharon was the beneficiary of Brittany's will. She lived off Brittany while she was alive, Angelo never took a penny.
Also, on your Justice for Brittany board,
It's a blog, and I'm a contributor, not the owner
you posted a question about why Brittany stopped using the Bertolotti name and went with Murphy and I have a question on that - when Brittany changed her name from Bertolotti, how close was Bertolotti to getting out of jail or was he already out
Brittany always used the name Murphy professionally. Her original passport was due to expire in 2006 but was cancelled in 2004, so that would have been around when the legal name change occurred. This was at the height of Brittany's career, when Sharon was trying to distance her from Angelo (for financial reasons?). I'm not aware of Angelo having been in jail since Brittany was a young child. -
BlueWatersWhiteDeath — 10 years ago(September 23, 2015 09:25 PM)
again. OK, again, Sharon was the beneficiary of Brittany's will. An inheritance which was constantly shrinking due to the decline in Brittany's career, due to her known prescription drug addiction. An addiction for which she refused to seek help for fear of bad publicity further accelerating the decline. As beneficiary, Sharon had a motive to ensure that Brittany's death, which she would have expected anyway the way things were going, came sooner. As for a motive for killing Simon, I can only speculate - either she would have stood to gain from that financially, or maybe feared he would talk, or both.
If Brittany's monies was declining when she was alive then they are still in decline now. Since most of her income was tied to the increase or decrease of sales for her movies.
Plainly nonsense, Sharon was the beneficiary of Brittany's will. She lived off Brittany while she was alive, Angelo never took a penny.
I was not talking about previous time, I am talking about now and in the future.
And since you still have not gotten it - let me explain it this way.
Fact - Sharon is sole beneficiary of Brittany's will.
Fact - Bertolotti is screaming to the world that "Sharon poisoned Brittany". Now I don't know how you read that one statement but from here, it is implied that Sharon MURDERED Brittany. Now I have heard California is backwards but in the other 49 states - if a beneficiary kills the benefactor (aka murder) then the inheritance moves to the next of kin which is who????? Berolotti. So let see you tell me again that Bertolotti does not have anything to gain by seeing Sharon Hung regardless of whether it is true or not - and by the way - I believe that you stated awhile back that your group (or maybe it was ShouldWeArrestMom that Stated it) that your goal was to try her in public opinion - well that same public will form her jury so i guess you can say that he is trying to fix the trial - just what you would expect huh.
Now I have a question for you - how can Bertolotti be sent to prison for three different crimes (according to The Sun), with his first crime being counterfeiting in 1968 and his last for Drug Smuggling and yet he only spent a total of 20 years in prison (average time 6 to 7 years)? Why was it that after he was convicted the last time, that he had to be picked up by the FBI and when they searched his motel room, they found a shotgun? Who was the shotgun for - the mob, the drug cartel or the police?
Next time you guys decide to back someone - you might want to do some research and now I know why ShouldWeArrestMom spent so much time trying to "Cleanup his image". Also, his IMDB bio is a joke - who wrote it - ShouldWeArrestMom? -
BrittanyMurphyRIP — 10 years ago(September 25, 2015 11:57 PM)
.
If Brittany's monies was declining when she was alive
Of that there is absolutely no doubt - are you suggesting otherwise?
then they are still in decline now. Since most of her income was tied to the increase or decrease of sales for her movies.
Obviously, yes, Brittany was not at the level where dying would be a good career move. But she (and Simon) DID stop spending her money when she died.
I was not talking about previous time, I am talking about now and in the future.
I was responding to this
In fact, the only person that stands to benefit from Brittany's death is Bertolotti and that is if he can prove that Sharon had something to do with Brittany's death which he has been doing ever since her death.
Sharon obviously benefited from Brittany's death since she was the sole beneficiary of her will. I added a relevant personality profile of Sharon, that she has shown a history of exploiting Brittany whereas Angelo has not. Why would Angelo suddenly be interested in Brittany's money now (in his late eighties), when he wasn't when she was alive? But in any case, the point is moot. The question is, is there reason to suppose that Sharon might have killed Brittany.
And since you still have not gotten it - let me explain it this way.
I got it alright
Fact - Sharon is sole beneficiary of Brittany's will.
Thanks for acknowledging
Fact - Bertolotti is screaming to the world that "Sharon poisoned Brittany".
Actually Julia Davis was the one doing the screaming, eventually identifying Sharon as the suspect as a pretext to attacking
http://www.imdb.com/board/13957278/combined
, after previously implying DHS agents were responsible (a position to which she has now returned since Angelo distanced himself from her).
Now I have a question for you - how can Bertolotti be sent to prison for three different crimes (according to The Sun), with his first crime being counterfeiting in 1968 and his last for Drug Smuggling and yet he only spent a total of 20 years in prison (average time 6 to 7 years)? Why was it that after he was convicted the last time, that he had to be picked up by the FBI and when they searched his motel room, they found a shotgun? Who was the shotgun for - the mob, the drug cartel or the police?
Is that all in the (now paywalled) Sun article, or are you getting info from another source? But anyway, how is that relevant to the question of whether Sharon Murphy killed Brittany Murphy?
Next time you guys decide to back someone - you might want to do some research
Obviously it has been public knowledge since 2003 that Angelo has served time for organised crime offences. This is of no relevance to Brittany's death.
and now I know why ShouldWeArrestMom spent so much time trying to "Cleanup his image".
Concerning the "estranged", "absent father" tag, not his criminal past.
Also, his IMDB bio is a joke - who wrote it - ShouldWeArrestMom?
Time to end your obsession with "shouldwearrestmom", she doesn't post (or likely read) here anymore.
This bio
http://www.imdb.com/board/25260201/bio
is clearly credited to "Fleur De Lis Studios", thus was written by Julia Davis, who is indeed a joke.