Doesn't claim all his children
-
jdancer124 — 17 years ago(May 18, 2008 07:38 AM)
read this: http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/Story?id=132388&page=1
-
!!!deleted!!! (4524359) — 17 years ago(February 09, 2009 05:54 PM)
"I don't know all the details, but leaving out a child is never an acceptable thing for a Christian man to do."
What a stupid comment. So you think it's ok if you're not christian? Do you think you have better morals because you are christian? You seem extremely ignorant. -
cannaganjabisweed — 17 years ago(March 18, 2009 01:52 PM)
Wikipedia? Oh, well it couldn't possibly be true then. They're even talking about water having a boiling point of 100 degrees celsius over there nowadays scoff. No, only the New York Times are reliable sources of informationz. Remember, words printed on paper are always true (apart from the IMDB).
Also, Cyruscitis couldn't claim all his children, even if he wanted to. Because, if he did, he might blow-ow up. -
-
notyou2188 — 16 years ago(April 17, 2009 01:16 PM)
You should you know stop being retarded. Wikipedia pages are constantly edited back to their original states within minutes if the edit is stupid or wrong. Furthermore, the majority of important pages are protected.
-
crazy_old_days — 16 years ago(April 22, 2009 07:12 PM)
Wikipedia is not a creditable source. Most of the information on there is biased and completely incorrect. Also, many Professors post inaccurate information on Wikipedia to make it easier to catch students plagiarism and laziness. The same can be said about sourcing Encyclopedia's, their information is dated, incorrect, and biased.
-
hppg — 16 years ago(April 17, 2009 07:53 PM)
I think it's so funny how people are trying to pretend he's this awesome family man and Christian when he got two women knocked up at once. LOL
About his web site though (link doesn't work any more), it was probably written by publicity people who weren't paying much attention. I think they're trying to keep the life of the other kid private too.
I read a dodgy tabloid article on it and I think what's awful is people were blaming both the women! They called Tish "vindictive" for not being happy about it - so he was basically cheating on her, and they call her vindictive for being unhappy? I'd say that's normal. And they referred to the mother of Christopher as a "gold digger" which is ridiculous considering there's very little information about him and he's always lived away from the Cyruses and not done anything that would seem to be aiming for fame. It seems like she's trying to keep him private. Sad that both women were criticised but BR wasn't.
