Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Didn't think she was very good….

Didn't think she was very good….

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
6 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Gina Bellman


    ExpressingYourself — 18 years ago(November 29, 2007 12:23 AM)

    in Jekyll. No offence intended, but her facial expression was painfully limited, and her voice was always awful. Frankly, she doesn't seem like a very good actress
    Bill Bailey - Hobbit:
    URL link:
    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/244583166

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      mlehman-4 — 16 years ago(July 04, 2009 08:36 AM)

      Actually, I came to realize that how great an actress she really is in "Jekyll". I didn't think she was good in the first few episodes, but she really brought it later when confronting Jekyll in the show. She was a strong character who was not afraid of a guy who could toss people around like a baseball.
      So different from her character in "Coupling". To me, that's what makes a good actress: When you can hardly recognise characters from one show to the next.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        sixpetite — 15 years ago(December 22, 2010 11:59 AM)

        I agree. Her voice is so awful, her expressions so limited. I kept wondering (sometimes aloud) how this actress landed the part, let alone any others!
        Also, she was supposed to have this power over James Nesbitt's character but they had absolutely NO CHEMISTRY!!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          kevrevace — 13 years ago(July 10, 2012 12:36 AM)

          Terrible actress.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            eamonnh101 — 10 years ago(February 11, 2016 03:23 PM)

            ^^and thats being nice

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Mystique RisingSun — 10 years ago(April 03, 2016 11:46 PM)

              That's what directors are for. If they'd wanted her to play it differently, she would have.
              She got the gig on Leverage because of her skill in Jekyll (not Coupling, which is what most assume). It's hard enough to act, acting "weird" is even harder.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0

              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups