Starship Troopers 3?!
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jolene Blalock
jcreed01 — 18 years ago(June 23, 2007 01:45 AM)
I saw Troopers 1 and let's just say it was nearly 2 hours of my life that I'll never get back! Nothing like Heinlein's classic book, more like a rejected pilot for a proposed series on the old UPN. Never knew there was a sequel- my guess it was direct to video. Troopers 3 looks like direct to DVD as well. One of Jolene's post-Enterprise interviews said she would avoid sci-fi flicks so as not to be typecastmust be a hell of a script to lure her back. I doubt it, she probably needs the work.
-
jcreed01 — 18 years ago(June 24, 2007 10:58 PM)
Filthy rich probably means hubby has a prenuptial agreement. Don't want to speculate on Jolene's personal financial situation; I should have wrote WANTS to work instead of NEEDS to work. Acting 1c84is her career and she needs to keep her face out there even if its Troopers 3.
-
-
mathyew — 16 years ago(May 15, 2009 10:21 AM)
unfortunately it did look like she had some work. And she really didnt need it. Her lips were amazing in enterprise, to actually use botox on those beauties was a crime. The only thing good about SST3 was sending up religion as a means to war, propaganda was always SSt strength. She needs to challenge herself and grow as an actress and stay far away from any type of plastic surgery, she far from needing it.
-
turmoil_23 — 13 years ago(February 18, 2013 06:43 AM)
The movie isnt good but at least it has the maurauder suits that are an essential partof the original book but where left out on the 1st movie (they are barely used here i guess because of the low budget)