Love this girl
-
fischy-1 — 21 years ago(May 04, 2004 08:00 AM)
Boy, that's amazing. Holly went to the same high school as Drew Barrymore. And your sister went to high school with them both. And their pictures are next to each other.
I'll accept that the pictures are next to each other despite that yearbooks are always in alpha order. Barrymore and Fields are just close enough to each other to make it work.
However, if that's true then both girls are in the same class because yearbooks are also always grouped by grade. So Drew and Holly are the same age.
But wait, Drew was born in Feb 1975 and Holly was born in Oct 1976. So I guess they weren't in the same grade after all.
And of course Drew never finished high school. She actually never made it to through the tenth grade as chronicled in her auto-biography 'Little Girl Lost.' She was actually institutionalized at the age of 14 for her various addictions.
Since Drew was out of the picture by 14, and Holly is 1.5 years younger than Drew than Holly was 12.5. But Holly wasn't in Los Angeles until she was 13.
Can you explain to me how Holly and Drew Barrymore ended up in the same yearbook, next to each other?
And of course this doesn't answer the question of understudying for Molly Ringwald in 'Through the Looking Glass' in 1973. Seeing as how Holly wouldn't be be born until 1976.
What difference does it make? None. Holly is hot and an ok actress. I hope her career goes well but don't knock Ella because she is right that Holly is in her 30's.
The entire concept that an actress has to be young is such BS. Julianne Moore, Demi Moore, Uma Thurman, Daryl Hannah, Kim Basinger - all over 40 in current feature movies and way sexy. -
Nowbacktome — 21 years ago(May 04, 2004 03:22 PM)
Wow, kind of sad. You have nothing else better to do with your day? It
s odd to me that Hollie is the ONLY person youve commented on on the entire IMDB. Makes me think youre an out of work actress or wanted to be an actress but you didnt make it and you are jellous of heror youre 12. Or something close to that. Hollie was in 9th grade with my sister for one month before going back to San Francisco. She came back and fourth for work which, I believe, it says in her bio.You say you think shes an ok actress yet everyone loves her because shes worked more than anyone I know without going on a famous name to get parts. She gets them souly on her talent. Plus theres a lot of stuff weve seen her in that isnt even on the IMDB. Anyway, it doesnt matter to me. I just think shes cool and I dont like people putting negative things up about anyone that doesnt deserve it. Im sure Hollie is too busy and doesnt care what people write. She never has. And one last thing, just because its on the internetdoesnt mean its true. People put whats on there and people make mistakes all the time. Look, if you were in Through the Looking Glass with them, itd be one thing. Dont go picking on innocent people on the internet. Thats weak. Publicists or agents write those bios. Its a little weird how angry you are about this. And if you have a bone to pick about this response, do it with me, not Hollie. -
fischy-1 — 21 years ago(May 04, 2004 06:12 PM)
You are probably Holly. Why else would you be here? Why else would you actually be paying attention and defending her? It's not like she's anything more than a C actress. I only found out about her because I love the OC and like to check out who's who.
It's very clear that Ho16d0lly is in her mid-30's. Big deal.
The entire concept that an actress has to be young is such BS. Julianne Moore, Demi Moore, Uma Thurman, Daryl Hannah, Kim Basinger - all over 40 in current feature movies and way sexy. Sexier than Holly IMHO.
But to blatantly lie about your age by more than 10 years and not be able to pull it off is just stupid. -
Nowbacktome — 21 years ago(May 05, 2004 12:08 AM)
God you need help and a life. Think whatever you want. You can
t accept the truth, thats your problem. I felt bad for someone thats a nice, good person. Im sure she doesnt even care. Shes obviously having a much more fulfilling life than you are and Im sure shes much sexier than you are. I check the IMDB all the time. Many people do. I saw your lame message and wanted to set it straight. Go and think whatever makes you feel better.
And Uma Thurman,.isn`t over 40. Oh wait Uma Thurman must be over 40, like you said, because YOU know everything. -
fischy-1 — 21 years ago(May 07, 2004 05:39 PM)
My bad, Uma isn't 40, She just looks 40.
Of course I was offering an opinion, not stating FACTS, like you claim to d do.
And that is completely besides the point Holly. They are all middle aged women who are hot, sexy, talented and not afraid to let the world see them age.
I think that you should do the same. You are obviously hot and middle-aged. So accept it and make the most of your career. -
Nowbacktome — 21 years ago(May 05, 2004 12:36 AM)
Oh, and by the way. Just discovered this2000. Look on awards for Holly Fields. She was nominated for 3 YOUTH In Film Awards in 1988, 1989, and 1990. According to you, she would have been 25 at the time of the last one which would have made it impossible for her to be nominated. You can
t be considered for a YOUTH In Film Award if you are over the age of 19. There is a sight where you can go and see all the nominees and winners. All well known actors and actresses. Its a very respected awards show. She never could have been nominated at the age of 23, 24 or 25 for this award. Maybe someone made a mistake on one of the bios and you`re freaking out over nothing? Ever think of that? -
Nowbacktome — 21 years ago(May 05, 2004 12:59 AM)
Just looked up the Youth Awards and the cut off age is 18, not 19 and they make you show a birth certificate too. So go pick on someone that actually deserves it. She DID go to school with my sister and Drew Barrymore and I don`t like being called a liar.
-
fischy-1 — 21 years ago(May 07, 2004 04:58 PM)
Hi Holly,
Name the school, the grade and the year.
You can't because it's not true. And you know it.
It's very simple. I'm not working off of the 1976 date listed in IMDB. I'm working off of your bio which states very clearly that you understudied for Molly Ringwald in 'Through the Looking Glass.' That's a whole lot of words to mistype.
Molly's bio also talks about that production and her age as 6 at the time. I also confirmed this separately on a Sacramento theater group website. Molly's bio also, correctly, states her birth year as 1968. Molly was around 6 years old when she did that production. Appropriately Molly's understudy would be another 6 year old.
Why this is interesting is that if Molly was 6 when she did that production that means it was in 1973. Which I confirmed at the Sacramento Theater site. You claim that you were born in 1976. Something is clearly wrong here. There is no way you could have understudied for her if you weren't born.
So ignoring all that evidence, let's assume that Molly's bio is incorrect and she was 6 at the same time as you. That means in 1982 you were both 6 years old.
Of course in 1982 Molly Ringwald was actually working on Sixteen Candles which was released on January 1, 1984 according to the Universal Studios website. I seriously doubt Molly Ringwald was six years old when she did that role.
It also means that Molly was 1 years old when she was a regular on the "Mickey Mouse Club" in 1977 and she was 2 when she was a regular on "The Facts of Life" in 1978.
So do you want to show me that yearbook still?
Do you want to name the school, grade and year?
I thought so.
Love forever,
Fischy -
lovinit — 21 years ago(December 25, 2004 10:28 PM)
She
s a great actress and she has proven it time and time again. She was just on JAG and stole the show. She needs to be doing more independents. Why do these other girls who arent as good work so much more? Get a new agent. Or get a publicist. M.B.