Wow, Hollywood blows it again
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Megan Gale
espressoboy — 18 years ago(February 15, 2008 09:34 PM)
Soooooooooooooooooo many choices and this is who they pick? Her face is not attractive at all.
Jill Wagner, Morena Baccarin, and Mary Elizabeth Winstead - any of these would have been great choices. -
mba-6 — 18 years ago(February 15, 2008 10:50 PM)
Well that's a matter of opinion. I'd hardly say its not attractive at all. Its just that you don't personally like it, but other people find her quite pretty, especially her eyes and bronzed skin.
I never really cared for the taste of meat. I always loved my Brussels sprouts! - KB
-
sofun — 18 years ago(March 12, 2008 06:37 AM)
I really disagree.
Her face is lovely (and she has the 'heroic' stong jaw to boot) and her physical frame is just perfect for the role.
Tall, long dark hair, broad shoulders, boobs and curves and light eyes - she's as close to Wonder Woman as any real live human is ever likely to get. -
saprater — 17 years ago(July 16, 2008 10:02 AM)
I don't know. In some of the pics, she looks like she could pull it off. And as much as I like Morena Baccarin, she's just too sweet looking. She's got the exotic part down patbut not the butt kicking maturity of an Amazon.
-
Star_blazer_9000 — 17 years ago(December 05, 2008 10:34 PM)
She is beautiful. Amazing body and all.
http://www.megangale.20m.com/cgi-bin/i/m28.jpg
http://www.megangale.20m.com/cgi-bin/i/m22.jpg
http://picsyard.com/_Sexy_Megan_Gale -
McQualude — 17 years ago(January 04, 2009 12:19 AM)
Jill Wagner, Morena Baccarin, and Mary Elizabeth Winstead - any of these would have been great choices.
Sorry, these are all terrible choices.
http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/classic_60s_scifi/ -