Garland and Boyle
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Alex Garland
Benihana14 — 20 years ago(June 29, 2005 08:42 PM)
Is there a backstory behind the collaborations of Boyle and Garland? Are the two guys friends, or does Boyle just really like Garland's style and always work on his stories? Either way, I like the final products, but would prefer Boyle to stick more exactly to the writings of Garland.
-
guillermotorofan — 20 years ago(January 25, 2006 05:24 PM)
Danny Boyle has worked with John Hodge his whole career, he isn't going to trade his partner and good friend because of the "failure" of the beach.
"Tell your mom the telephone lady hopes its a girl this time"-Breakfast on Pluto -
Roguetrooper74 — 16 years ago(November 29, 2009 03:32 PM)
Either way the interpretation of the novel was poorly adapted on screen.
There were too many things wrong with the film.Ewen Mcgregor would have been suited the part of Richard,more so than Di Caprio.Not enough was made of the relationships between the other characters on the beach.Robert Caryle's Daffy
should have featured more in the breakdown of Richard's character.The ending
was a commercial cop out.Way too many things to mention.
For the 2/15 ruuning time they could have made an entirely different film. -
Donald_Hai — 17 years ago(January 07, 2009 10:46 AM)
Not really, I mean Sunshine and 28 Days Later was excellent. In fact I've read all his books, and seen all of Danny Boyle's films, and I really liked The Beach, it is a very underrated film BTW.
If Talk is Cheap, than I can't Afford to Pay Visits. -
darkosilencIO — 18 years ago(April 28, 2007 10:32 AM)
The Beach can be a commercial failure, but I don't think Danny Boyle's interest is to please the audience. The Beach is a remarkable piece of drama and I'm extremely annoyed by people who keep saying the films they make from books are crap. First of all, a movie is not a book, so adaptating a book for the screen means just "betraying it" most of the time. Second thing, I bet a lot of you wouldn't have read those books if a movie wasn't made. So, basically you should thank people like sir Stanley Kubrick (rest in peace) - for instance - who transformed a bunch of not-so-bity novels in great artworks that now are considered unanimously fundamental milestones in the history of cinema.
-
!!!deleted!!! (1900212) — 18 years ago(April 28, 2007 06:25 PM)
The Beach was a good film, but when taken in light of the book, is quite poor. Danny Boyle is quite an adept filmmaker, and so it is really suprising that he somehow managed to miss the essence of the book when putting it onto the bigscreen. Much of the menace and society from the book disipated in the wake of a pleasant but almost gimiky pop culture.
Sometimes the book is better, sometimes the film is better. Here, it's the book. -
bm_productions — 17 years ago(August 26, 2008 11:46 AM)
Are you forgetting that Leo is only in the film because of studio insistence. Is it not possible that certain aspects of the film had to change in order to please these same studio types.
Regardless of this however, The Beach is a brilliant film and one of my favorites.
Oh and so I can keep on topic with the original poster. I'm certain that the relationship between Boyle and Garland stretches no further than, Boyle made his adaption, Garland handed over a script he'd written, Boyle got it made, film became success, Boyle wants more of a good thing and likes this critical acclaim and commercial success. Not too much mysyery to it really.