Nice Moles

[fgadmin]

squiffydoodle — 13 years ago(June 23, 2012 08:05 PM)

I think it's a good idea to have moles removed. Not only can they become precancerous, they're distracting, and an actor doesn't need something that distracts from his work

[fgadmin]

Frqtflyr — 11 years ago(July 31, 2014 02:08 AM)

Thank you, so true. Gabriel (and Rachel) are truly gorgeous. Not to mention terrific actors. But Gabriel's looks are marred by the moles. I've never understood how people can call them beauty marks. They're anything but. They're eyesores (and not at all sexy to the touch, btw). And I love how people5b4 call them "distinctive." Yep, distinctively and distinctly unattractive. I suspect the otherwise delicious Patrick J. Adams was cast in part because of his rather prominent, distracting, ugly mole. Diverts attention from Gabriel's blemishes.
But yes, he is otherwise hunky and certainly a talented actor. But get them removed, dude. It could save your life.

[fgadmin]

big_kmc — 10 years ago(July 25, 2015 01:24 PM)

Gabriel Macht is by far one of the sexiest men I have ever seen. The moles add something, like in spite of the distraction, the sexiness conquers all. He could have gotten them removed if he wanted. I had a friend who is very gorgeous who had a similar mole and she got it removed, there is a slight scar there but you have to look for it.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.