What total bunk! This is a cover-up!
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Ghislaine Maxwell
Lilith — 7 months ago(August 23, 2025 12:47 AM)
I have so many issues with this "interview". First of all, for total fairness, there should have been a Republican representative (our DOJ), a Democrat representative, and an independent civilian non-partisan arbiter or mediator, preferably a lawyer, who would ensure that she wasn't being baited.
She was asked loaded questions with presumptive assumptions. Framing a question is everything. To ask, "You didn't see President Clinton get a massage, did you?" infers to her that
that
is the answer they're looking for, and she knows how to answer. She's also covering both sides of the aisle in hopes of an eventual pardon as well as potential protection. She's aware that implicating the "wrong" people can land her DOA as well.
Her putting it out there that a prison hit can be had for $25 had less to do with Epstein killing himself and more to do with reminding the audience that SHE can be taken out if she doesn't say the right things
about
the right people
to
the right people.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
sheetsadam1 — 7 months ago(August 23, 2025 01:04 AM)
They have over 100,000 pages of documents related to the case. The only reason this interview was conducted in the first place was so that this transcript could eventually come out
not
implicating your lord and savior, as both parties had agreed to beforehand.
"Praise be to Allah." - President Donald J. Trump, Easter Sunday 04/05/2026 -
The<>Mechanic — 7 months ago(August 23, 2025 01:12 AM)
Agree and I’m glad you see what a load of bunk this DOJ interview with this hag was. There are people on both sides of the political system that should be roasted alive if the real truth comes out.
Ho Ho Ho -
Lilith — 7 months ago(August 23, 2025 02:10 AM)
I have been listening to it this afternoon and this evening. First I read the transcripts, but you really need to listen to her speak, to hear what she says, what she doesn't say, and how she reacts when being asked questions. There are areas where she seems very consistent and has quick delivery, but she also has moments where she sounds like she's hedging, hemming and hawing or being too verbose.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
Lilith — 7 months ago(August 24, 2025 01:34 AM)
What really throws a wrench in this exchange is that there was no independent person there to monitor this exchange, and all we have is the audio recording and the written transcript. The audio gives
some
insight into how I believe (and to clarify, this is just my opinion as it cannot be proven or verified) that she was being coached to some degree, and that can happen in a multitude of ways.
The leading questions led me to believe she knows what she has to say to make sure that she keeps
all
of her options open, doesn't incriminate
anyone
(on both sides of the aisle as well as protecting all intelligence agencies from around the world) and not name names. Knowing the names is the only leverage she retains.
There was a period where long, dramatic pauses before she spoke about how she didn't believe Epstein committed suicide, that rather than go into detail about who (names of individuals, alleged clients, intelligent agencies, etc.) she thought might've been responsible, I
do
think that she was sending a clear message when she spoke about how the "going rate for a hit" to kill someone in prison can be as low as $25.00. That comment has
multiple implications
. Maybe she was referring to who could get to Epstein, but I think (my opinion) that she was (also) trying to make it clear that she had better play ball according to the "right people" (wherever they may be, whoever they are), or
she
could just as easily find herself having a "misadventure".
A
huge
unaddressed question remains. Wasn't her "little black book" (which I
thought
held names, addresses and personal information) was
booked
into evidence and
sealed
, where it remains. If there's no "list" (be it go by any other name, description or title),
what
evidence/information/documents did she possess that required her to turn it over and
how
is it that it remains legally sealed.
There are too many holes in this. A fellow inmate at the time who complained about how Maxwell was sent to this particular very low security prison (with a reputation for being cushy) was immediately transferred to a high security facility elsewhere. That's peculiar.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
Lilith — 7 months ago(August 24, 2025 01:55 AM)
I can completely understand them (collectively) protecting the victims and the identities of the girls and women who were trafficked and pimped out. I know many people feel that Maxwell is the fall guy and that all of the girls and women had total agency and could have "just walked away" and are deemed "just as guilty" as Epstein and Maxwell because they were used to recruit more girls. Whoever is suggesting this does not understand the brain and mindset of someone who has had a life of trauma, violence, drug addiction and abuse. Getting out of any abusive "relationship" (a definition that has many meanings), especially with that type of history, is simply not that simple and clearcut.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
LivingDeadBoy
️ — 7 months ago(August 24, 2025 01:53 AM)I don't think shes crazy. She's super intelligent, but with a bent moral compass. She should finish her 20 years sentence. I think she will be out before christmas though and go straight to France or the UK.
Fidelio♟️
