Which blockbuster films has Saoirse missed out on or turned down ?
-
BrazenRaisin — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 11:58 PM)
In fairness, I noticed a few days ago that the Scarlet Witch rumour had been added to her Trivia section, so it's understandable that people would read it there and assume it's true. I submitted an edit to have it deleted, but the page hasn't been updated and I've yet to receive a follow-up e-mail, so I think the submission is still stuck in the queue.
-
tarakate — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 10:42 AM)
From IndieWire
Jennifer Connelly & Saoirse Ronan Board Russell Crowes Ark In Darren Aronofskys Noah
Jennifer Connelly & Saoirse Ronan Board Russell Crowe's Ark In Darren Aronofsky's 'Noah'
Simon Dang
Apr 26, 2012 8:22 am
Rumors of their involvement have been circulating for the last week or so, and it looks like things are now set in place with Paramount honcho Adam Goodman confirming the addition of Jennifer Connelly and Saoirse Ronan to Darren Aronofsky's "Noah" for what he describes as a "perfect combination of casting." -
tarakate — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 10:37 AM)
She was offered that role and plenty others. Maybe in the next year or two, as gets a bit older she'll do a franchise. I remember reading an interview where she stated that she wasn't interested in doing a franchise just for the sake of doing one like most actors, and that she was worried about becoming overexposed too young, and the script and the people involved would have to be second to none if she were do to one.
-
trvscrosley — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 03:27 PM)
You are really such a downer. She is only 22 and has her whole career ahead of her; none of those films (in my opinion) would've heightened her a career much more than the ones she decided to do. Part of the business is networking and through smaller indies she's got to work with great directors and build relationships with them. Her talent will shine and eventually the right project will come, just have patience.
Also, I've heard she is being considered for a Snow White live action? I would need to find the source, but that would be great exposure for her even if SW is a bit overexposed as a character. -
tarakate — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 04:51 AM)
There's a new one being made by Disney soon, so maybe she'll be in that?
2012: SCOTT COLLURA Saoirse Ronan (Hanna, The Lovely Bones) is in final negotiations with Disney to star in Order of Seven.
Variety reports that while the film was "originally developed as a Kung Fu retelling of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs [it] has since been reworked as a standalone action adventure that's cut all ties to the classic tale." The project has been in the works in some capacity for the past 10 years. Ronan will play "Olivia Sinclair, a British expat in 19th century Hong Kong, who seeks the protection of a centuries old group of warriors, now a jaded group of outlaws. After the reemergence of an ancient evil empress, Sinclair helps the warriors reclaim their destiny and noble roots."
The warriors are expected to be played by an international cast of actors, hence giving the film better legs overseas. Michael Gracey will make his feature directorial debut on the picture.
Of course, Relativity has the Snow White tale "Mirror Mirror" and Universal has "Snow White and the Huntsman" coming up, so this film's distancing itself from the fairest of them all probably makes sense. -
purple_lemon — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 05:52 PM)
You are really such a downer.
Oh dear I've caused a mini-meltdown in a generation snowflake type
none of those films (in my opinion) would've heightened her career much more than the ones she decided to do.
Oh really? Then your opinion isn't worth much is it
Her talent will shine and eventually the right project will come, just have patience.
I am not in the least impatient and her talents have already shone brightly many times, most notably in 'Death Defying Acts' (2007).
My point I suppose if I have to spell it out is that in my opinion Saoirse was ill advised to turn down 'The Hobbit' films because they were as close to sure bet hits as you can get in the film making business and that is a rarity. Instead she chose to roll the dice on doing the half dozen films she did do and none of them were a hit.
Now you can argue that 'The Hobbit' films were mindless popcorn movies and to an extent that is true, but if Saoirse had done them she would now be set for life financially (barring financial screw-ups) and be a much more widely known actress with a couple of massive earning films to her name (and in Hollywood that matters).
The Players of The Game are the scum of the earth. -
trvscrosley — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 09:00 PM)
Oh really? Then your opinion isn't worth much is it
None of those roles that she turned down had any cinematic impact at all character wise, so how exactly is that observation not worth much? The majority of her small films have allowed her to meet with people that then suggested her for further films down the line (OCB).
Furthermore, she has now reached the age (and through the exposure of Brooklyn) to play actual adult aged roles. She doesn't need to take part in action-hero blockbusters in order to make a bigger name for herself; bigger parts will come as she gets older.
Also, you can rest assured there was no meltdown here. I was simply making an observation based on the majority of the content in your posts. -
cadelano — 9 years ago(January 18, 2017 07:57 AM)
Sigh.
So I know some of you might feel anxious that Saoirse might not be receiving the attention and getting the spotlight that she deserves, meanwhile less accomplished people in her age range such as beep Lily Collins (she gets on my nerves and she even got a freaking book deal) or the supporting cast in Taylow Swift's squad get all the attention. Well, that is irrelevant. A film career is a marathon, not a sprint. And1c84 even though Saoirse is a one-in-a-generation distance runner, she already has two Oscar nods. At 22. And they would've been three so far if Peter Jackson had pulled his head out of his own ass when making
The Lovely Bones
. It's not that she will be fine, when Cate Blanchett pretty much has designated you as her artistic daughter-heir, when Helen Mirren is grannying you, when Jodie Foster is cool-auntying you, it means that she's going places. She doesn't need a blockbuster now and she will be fine without them for now. It wouldn't hurt if she were to be cast in one, it will certainly raise her profile, but she is getting there surely. And once again, she is just 22.
That being said, let's take a look at the blockbusters she missed out on:- Hobbit trilogy: There was one prominent female character in the trilogy, played by Evangeline Lilly. Does anyone remember what her role was? Was it anywhere as prominent as Arwyn's? The movies were commercially successful but mediocre, disappointing most fans. Not a good thing to be associated with.
- Scarlet Witch in the MCU: Sure, it is a big role. Elizabeth Olsen is becoming a household name. But can anyone here, in all honesty, say that Scarlet Witch is character that 'shines' on her own? So far, she has mostly been a plot device in the MCU. Maybe her role will grow in the future, but she is always in the shade of Black Widow.
- Anna Karenina: Kitty, at least in the novel, is one of the least interesting and less prominent female characters. She's just there to be pure and pretty. She did well passing on it, and I have a guessing it's because she doesn't want supporting roles anymore, unless it is in an ensemble film (like Wes Anderson's). And it can't be said that Kitty was Alicia Vikander's breakout role, that was
A Royal Affair
. - Star Wars: In her own words, everyone is auditioning for them, and in the spirit of the originals, the producers prioritized cating an unknown as Rey. But yeah, I really hope she gets cast in one of the anthology movies to come (coughreplaceEmiliaClarkeintheHanSoloonebecauseshe'smediocrecough).
- That Order of the Seven movie: This movie was announced when all those Snow White adaptations came around. Disney pulled the plug for now, but see below why I think it's not dead yet.
But here's one thing to keep an eye on: If
On Chesil Beach
replicates the success of
Brooklyn
(grossing somewhere between 35M and 50M WW), if
Lady Bird
does anywhere as well as
Frances Ha
(between 5 M to 10 M WW) and if the Mary Queen of Scots movie does as well as the
Elizabeth
movies (upwards of 60 M WW), then she would become a rarity among rarities, an actress that can 'open' mid-budget films into sleeper hits, based on her performances and movie presence alone, which is the case of both
Hanna
and
Brooklyn
(and if I'm correct, I've heard that
How I Live Now
and
Byzantium
are on their way to become cult hits). I think it's something that might very well happen in the next few years, and it's a very enviable position. I mean, she is still going to become one of the top stars of her generation, she will win awards and Vogue covers and fandom even if these movies don't do well, but if I am anywhere near correct, she could be on her way to a steady type of bankability that very few actors (think of Denzel Washington, Emma Stone, Meryl or -soon- Amy Adams) can attest to, not even JLaw can. And it puts her in a great position to negociate salaries when time comes to star in a franchise-blockbuster thingy.
And also, she will most likely be offered a part in one of the upcoming Disney live action adaptations. I think it will probably be Snow White, and something interesting will come of it.
Anyway, I'm still looking forward to seeing her having a role in the next Mad Max movies. And the upcoming Top Gun sequel (female characters in latter Tom Crusie movies have been AMAZING).
-
Steve7216 — 9 years ago(January 19, 2017 06:22 PM)
It's been quite a while cadelano. Terrific, epic-type post.
There was one prominent female character in the trilogy, played by Evangeline Lilly. Does anyone remember what her role was?
I remember her being a fierce warrior and falling in love (unconsummated) with a character not her own kind. That's about it.
There was a discussion here some years back focusing on the issue of supporting vs. lead roles. I'm sure everyone is fine with her taking supporting roles, but she has clearly chosen lead or co-lead parts for many years now. I think it's great actually.
She has targeted roles that are challenging and interesting, the ones having a bit of depth to them. It's just a matter of time until she lands something in a big commercial film. It'll be fun and different for us, and perhaps she'll receive much more exposure as a result.
In the meantime, I'm perfectly happy antici5b4pating her prestige projects that'll hopefully land her more award attention.