she's a horrible person, attacking and making fun of Chloe Grace Moretz
-
lisanovel — 10 years ago(March 10, 2016 03:06 PM)
But why would anyone NOT want to hate on Kim Kardashian? What about her would inspire any sort of admiration? She's a narcissistic douche-canoe. And that's putting it mildly.
The ratio of people to cake is too big. -
ClaireRedfieldFanForever — 10 years ago(March 11, 2016 07:24 AM)
Open your eyes and face the facts Kim did indeed sold her sex tape for money with her mother Kris help and the Kardashians open their door when they agree to do a reality tv show and when sell their stories to media make it everyone business what they do.
-
lukejbarnett2002 — 10 years ago(March 11, 2016 02:58 AM)
what are you talking about? the more a person knows about kim the likelier they are to hate her because then they know more about how horrible of a person that she is. if they don't know as much, then they don't have as much to hate. what are you actually saying that if we, "really got to know who kim is that we would actually like and respect her???!!!" she's not deep, so there's nothing to find out about her. and we would be more repulsed and more ashamed of her if we got to know her in her personal life.
-
GetOffMyLawn — 10 years ago(March 16, 2016 10:15 PM)
the more a person knows about kim the likelier they are to hate her because then they know more about how horrible of a person that she is.
Yeah, she's so horrible. I mean she's killed, bombed, raped, and tortured thousands. How will we ever recover from her horrible nature?
You guys act like she's Pol Pot or some sh!t. Oh well, pathetic attention is better than no attention I suppose. I said I was done but came back for more, I shouldn't have. I'm out amigos! I'll let you desperate housewives debate about how much of a whore Kim is and how monstrous of a person you view one single woman. -
ClaireRedfieldFanForever — 10 years ago(March 17, 2016 08:03 AM)
That not what Luke meant.
Luke meant Kim so damn shallow and full of herself that she wouldn't be fun to hang around with and their only one thing Kim cares about herself and she still sell her body for money and fame, Because that the only way she stays in the spotlight -
Ultraviolenxe — 9 years ago(April 28, 2016 10:13 AM)
Chloe should have shut her mouth. Kim can do whatever the fck she wants. If she wants to show her titties, great. Her labia? Great. Who the hell cares? And since when has Kim ever claimed to be a "role model"? I think even Kim would laugh at the notion that she's a role model for little girls. Chloe should h5b4ave stayed in her little lane, and maybe try to pick movie roles that don't end up as box office flops.
-
lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(July 02, 2016 06:39 PM)
who care if she knows she's not a role model. she's posing nude with no purpose other than to shamefully dehumanize herself and keep herself famous. and even if you think you are not a role model you are whether you like it or not.
-
ludances — 9 years ago(May 07, 2016 10:36 AM)
I think I've seen Chloe in one movie, but she has more talent in her little finger than Kim has in that humongous body of hers. I have no idea what this 'fight' is all about, nothing new, people attack each other on social media all the time, but if Kim thinks she's so above everyone and so famous for her 'talent', then why is she responding to a teenager??
Knock if off Napolean make yourself a dang quesadil-la! -
RequiredFields — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 04:35 PM)
Chlo Grace Moretz has a net worth of $12,000,000.
Kim Kardashian, on the other hand, has a net worth of $149,000,000.
Chlo Grace Moretz is infinitely more talented in her profession than Kim Kardashian could ever dream of being at anything.
Let that sink in for a few minutes.
I'm a heavy metal maniac.
Metal = best form of music ever