What Classics Did You See Last Week (December 3-9)
-
unex — 2 years ago(December 11, 2023 01:11 PM)
That Man from Rio (1964) - They call it a Bond spoof. The bar for qualifying as a Bond spoof is low. No strict spoof of the character of James Bond is required, just international intrigue—not necessarily espionage related—and exotic locales. These types of movies are more about the novelty of international travel than spoofing a Bond movie which didn't take themselves seriously enough to need spoofing anyway. This movie has the actor who played Largo in Thunderball, but a year before that movie came out. It's a fun movie.
Jamaica Inn (1939) - Hitchcock hated it, Daphne de Maurier hated it, Hitchcock fans hate it, but I liked it. It has a good main villain. Every other villain showed at least a little humanity but he was a pure psychopath. -
Doghouse-6 — 2 years ago(December 11, 2023 09:10 PM)
I'm a Hitchcock fan, and I like
Jamaica Inn
too.
For years, I avoided it due to Hitch's derision, but was pleasantly surprised because I was expecting so little. Laughton was over the top - that's often much of the fun of his performances - but it was full of the director's recognizable touches, and I enjoyed it enough to revisit it more than once.
Poe! You are…avenged! -
Doghouse-6 — 2 years ago(December 12, 2023 10:52 PM)
Again, full disclosure: it's not top-drawer Hitchcock by any means. But it is nowhere near as poor or negligible as the director made it out to be.
My two-bit psychological analysis is that Hitchcock's disdain for the film was really only a reflection of latter-day disappointment in himself for his half-hearted efforts. Had he not already made a commitment to Selznick stateside and been in a hurry to wrap up his final one in England, he might have been more invested in the film and, possibly, in restraining Laughton. As a result, it ends up being a Laughton picture at least as much as a Hitchcock one. And from what I know about Hitchcock, that may well have been his biggest objection.
But I'm on record with assertions that every Hitchcock picture offers things of interest and value, and this one offers more than some other of his lesser efforts.
Poe! You are…avenged! -
spiderwort — 2 years ago(December 13, 2023 01:22 PM)
Thanks for the clarifications. And based upon your general comments and those of
@unex
, I have a feeling I'm missing something by not seeing it, so I'll give it a go the next chance I have. I'm surprised I've haven't seen it already anyway. -
Doghouse-6 — 2 years ago(December 13, 2023 03:52 PM)
Yes, I remember. Once Hitchcock had settled on his evaluations and anecdotes to represent any of his pictures, they tended to remain unaltered over the years.
He never spoke much about other directors, and even more rarely by name, but I'd love to know what his opinion was of Laughton as a director, and his boldly-stylized and astonishing
Night of the Hunter
.
Poe! You are…avenged!