I do not understand
-
sean-cronin — 9 years ago(August 08, 2016 12:42 PM)
Really?
First, look at her. She is gorgeous. Really, really gorgeous.
Next, she is a damn movie star. Huge screen presence. She would have been a star at any time in Hollywood history. You could plug her into any old movie, and it would work. -
-
dejmonsalvatore4 — 9 years ago(August 26, 2016 04:09 AM)
It's not just her. Every time some movie is in focus, papers are always "thrilled, amazed, astounded etc" with that person. Margot is cutish, non-plastic non-scandal blonde who is ok actress and that's enough for me to like someone.
As long as her movies are popular, she will be the center of attention. Then the new Margot will show up and take the spot. Circle of the news. And Hollywood. -
Hasjtracker — 9 years ago(September 04, 2016 05:35 PM)
Margot is cutish, non-plastic non-scandal blonde
Hmmm no she is extremely easy to replicate.Go to a randmom plastic-surgeon and ask to look like here and he can deliver.
The utopia of plastic.
That is why is she is pushed so hard at the moment
-
carrieandxtina — 9 years ago(August 26, 2016 05:49 PM)
She is gorgeous and talented actress. Margot not being your type doesn't make her any less beautiful. I don't think Scarlett Johanson is the bombshell people make her to to be either. I also don't think those who find her attractive are "brainwashed". They just like her type. Its not Hollywood brainwashing the public its just people preferring different types of beauty. Actresses tend to promote. They are easy to avoid. I'm a fan of Margot. I don't even notice her being everywhere. I also don't follow that type of stuff constantly.